Articles

Arachni vs OWASP ZAP

Penetration testing (pen testing) is crucial for developing and maintaining hardened, attack-resilient systems—these can be applications, nodes, or entire networks/environments. Specialized tools are readily available for discovering vulnerabilities and security gaps in these systems; in this comparison, we'll compare Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), two popular security suites for application-level pen testing.


Filed under: security, data breaches, vulnerabilities, continuous security

ForeScout vs Tanium

IT admins managing expansive infrastructures require specialized tools for discovering IT assets living in their environments—no trivial task, considering the myriad of nodes connected at any given time: guest laptops, mobile devices, dev/test servers, virtual machines, old desktops, and more. Cybersecurity suites such as ForeScout and Tanium have made infrastructure discovery and visibility their bread-and-butter; let's see how they stack up in this comparison.

Filed under: security, data breaches, vulnerabilities, continuous security, ForeScout, Tanium

Tripwire vs Qualys

In a recent report by Forbes and BMC, known vulnerabilities were cited as the leading cause of data breaches, accounting for 44 percent of security incidents. These statistics underscore the importance of proper vulnerability management; judging by the continued failure of organizations to properly patch/update their software and systems, the practice is easy in theory but hard in practice. Tripwire and Qualys are two cybersecurity vendors with a keen focus on keeping vulnerabilities in check—let's see how they stack up in this comparison. 

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, tripwire, continuous security, Qualys

Tanium vs IBM BigFix

You may have heard that perimeter security is dead, but rest assured, IT folks aren't about to do way with their corporate firewalls just yet. The perimeter is just one—albeit critical—dimension of your organization's digital attack surface, and endpoint security is no less important, especially with the continued enterprise adoption of cloud and mobile technologies. Tanium and IBM BigFix are competing solutions in this space that were, interestingly, born from the same progeny.

Filed under: security, data breaches, vulnerabilities, continuous security, Tanium, IBM

Tripwire vs Varonis

Data analytics continue to play an integral function in cybersecurity—from SIEM to advanced network-based intrusion detection (NID), today's leading solutions are heavily reliant on data science-backed, actionable threat intelligence to detect and mitigate cyber attacks. Varonis is one such vendor whose platform revolves around cybersecurity data analytics; let's see how it holds up against leading security vendor Tripwire.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, tripwire, continuous security, Varonis

Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike


Network and perimeter-based security remains a crucial pillar of enterprise resilience, but with the rise of new computing models like the cloud and mobile, more emphasis is being placed on protecting endpoints than ever before. And with business processes and communications increasingly take place outside of traditional firewall boundaries, vendors like Carbon Black and CrowdStrike are focused on protecting these potential cyber attack entry points wherever they may be, inside or outside the perimeter network.

Filed under: security, data breaches, vulnerabilities, continuous security, Carbon Black, CrowdStrike

Tanium vs SCCM

More often, catastrophic outages and security compromises can be traced back to simple misconfigurations and unpatched systems. This isn't to say that elements like pilot error and the workings of nefarious actors are not common—they certainly are—but IT asset misconfigurations tend to be the lowest common denominator in most of these scenarios. That being the case, a plethora of solutions focus on systems management for maintaining strong security and quality of service. Tanium and Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) are two such solutions competing in this space.

Filed under: Microsoft, vulnerabilities, continuous security, Tanium, SCCM, IT operations

Tripwire vs OSSEC

Effective cybersecurity is no longer relegated to deep-pocketed enterprises—a myriad of open source solutions can offer adequate protection to the most cash-strapped of organizations. That said, there are some capabilities free just won't get you, but how critical are they in the grand scheme of cyber resilience and are they worth the price tag? Tripwire and OSSEC are two popular solutions on opposite sides of this spectrum; let's see how they stack up.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, tripwire, continuous security, OSSEC

Tripwire vs RedSeal

To survive in today's cyber threat landscape, enterprises increasingly rely on layered defenses to smooth out attack surfaces. A variety of tools are available to cover all parts of the security continuum: security information and event management (SIEM), security configuration management (SCM), vulnerability detection, and more. Tripwire and RedSeal are two platforms that cover different, but equally important, aspects of enterprise security—let's see how they stack up in this comparison.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, tripwire, continuous security, RedSeal

AlienVault vs QRadar

It's not uncommon for organizations to encounter hundreds of security incidents on a daily basis—from the trivial poking and prodding of script kiddies to nefarious activities that constitute the inner workings of advanced persistent threats (APTs). Transforming this volume of data into actionable information is impossible without the assistance of security intelligence, specifically, the analytic capabilities of security information and event management (SIEM) tools. AlienVault USM and IBM QRadar are two leading platforms that focus heavily on these areas—let's see how they stack in this comparison.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, continuous security, IBM, AlienVault

FireEye vs Fortinet for Continuous Security

How does the fourth-largest network security company by revenue hold up against the first cybersecurity firm certified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security? Fortinet's appliances and next generation firewalls (NGFW) have made it a category leader in unified threat management (UTM); let's see how they stack up against FireEye's comprehensive suite of enterprise security solutions.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, continuous security, FireEye, Fortinet

Metasploit vs Nmap for Ethical Hacking

It's been said that to defeat cyber attackers, you must think like them. For most organizations, this seldom is the case; efforts to bolster cybersecurity measures rarely go beyond implementing stronger controls, training employees to be vigilant, and—on occasion—hiring outside firms to assist in security testing efforts. However, for firms intent on staying one step ahead of nefarious actors, penetrating their own network defenses on a regular basis is crucial to maintaining continuously effective security. To this end, Metasploit and Nmap are two popular tools that enable firms to diagnose critical security gaps before they lead to data breaches.

Filed under: vulnerabilities, continuous security

Cylance vs Tanium for Endpoint Protection and Security

Cylance and Tanium—both firms are in the billion dollar valuation club, but what does this buy in terms of cybersecurity? Tanium claims 15 seconds to visibility and control, while Cylance combines AI and machine learning with endpoint protection. Let's find out if these security vendors' solutions can give organizations a fighting chance in a digital world fraught with cyber threats.

Filed under: vulnerabilities, continuous security

Tanium vs Intel Security for Endpoint Detection and Response

15 second visibility versus three decades of infosec experience, which will ultimately prevail? Tanium claims it can provide security teams with visibility and control over every endpoint in 15 seconds or less, regardless of network size; Intel Security is of course the venerable McAfee, rebranded/repositioned after being acquired by its current namesake in 2011. Find out how these two compare when it comes to protecting today's enterprises against cyber threats.

Filed under: vulnerabilities, continuous security

Tenable vs Symantec for Continuous Security

Effective cybersecurity these days is a complex and multifaceted affair involving a myriad of approaches: intrusion detection/prevention, vulnerability detection, malware mitigation, security configuration management (SCM), security information and event management (SIEM), patch management, file integrity monitoring (FIM), and more. For most organizations, however, the shortest path of least resistance means deploying a consolidated platform combining a multitude of these approaches. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View (CV) and Symantec Endpoint Protection are two such offerings.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, continuous security, Symantec, Tenable

Tenable vs Qualys

Continuous security and vulnerability detection—both Tenable and Qualys have built industry-leading suites around these two cybersecurity disciplines. The latter in particular serves as a focal point for both vendors, with Tenable SecurityCenter and Qualys Enterprise going head-to-head for the top slot in the vulnerability management category. Let's see how the two stack up in this comparison.

Filed under: security, vulnerabilities, continuous security, Qualys, Tenable

AlienVault vs Tenable for Continuous Security

As perimeter-based cyber protection falls to the wayside, a new breed of continuous security solutions are emerging that combine traditional endpoint protection with newer technologies like security information and event management  (SIEM) and crowdsourced threat intelligence. These next generation security platforms attempt to address the needs of both traditional on-premise data centers as well as organizations with entire IT infrastructures in the cloud. Two vendors—AlienVault and Tenable—have products on the market that fall in this category. Let's see how they stack up in this comparison.

Filed under: compliance, monitoring, continuous security