# Prevalent vs Whistic: 2025 Comparison

> This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/compare/prevalent-vs-whistic](https://www.upguard.com/compare/prevalent-vs-whistic), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Ratings, security scores and pricing details reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive comparison.

Compare the capabilities and features of Prevalent and Whistic. See which solution performs best across a range of categories.

## Platforms compared
- UpGuard (UpGuard — publisher of this comparison)
- Prevalent
- Whistic

## Feature-by-feature comparison: Prevalent vs Whistic

### General summary
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.
- **Prevalent**: 4/5 — Provides a risk rating between 0 and 100 but unknown number of companies covered.
- **Whistic**: 2/5 — Relies on standardized security questionnaires.

### Key strengths
- **UpGuard**: UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.

### Key weaknesses
- **UpGuard**: UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.

### Usability and learning curve
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.
- **Prevalent**: 4/5 — Risks detailed on each point-in-time vendor assessment, as well as cybersecurity risk ratings.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Risks detailed on each point-in-time vendor assessment, which means new risks are only detected during the next assessment process. Remediation requests are not available. Their risk assessments are aligned to the VSA questionnaire, CAIQ, SIG, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, CIS Security Controls, and Privacy Shield Framework.

### Cyber risk data accuracy
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. [Threat Monitoring](https://www.upguard.com/product/breach-risk/threat-monitoring) scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.
- **Prevalent**: 4/5 — Relies on point-in-time risk assessments and cybersecurity risk ratings based on monitoring 1,500+ criminal forums; thousands of onion pages, 80+ dark web special access forums; 65+ threat intelligence feeds; and 50+ paste sites for leaked credentials and potentially targeted companies — as well as several security communities, code repositories, and vulnerability databases.
- **Whistic**: 2/5 — Relies on risk assessments which can quickly become out of date as new zero-day exploits are discovered and new IT infrastructure is used. The truth is that questionnaires, much like penetration testing, can be subjective and become inaccurate over time as new security issues emerge. Additionally, Whistic provides no controls for capturing data loss incidents.

### Vendor risk management features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. [AI-powered security questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/product/vendor-risk/questionnaire-management) read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.

### Attack surface management features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.

### Security ratings
- **UpGuard**: A grade (943/950), live UpGuard security rating
- **Prevalent**: A grade (890/950), live UpGuard security rating
- **Whistic**: A grade (833/950), live UpGuard security rating

### Customer support
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite [responsive, hands-on support](https://www.upguard.com/customer-support) as a reason they continue with UpGuard.
- **Prevalent**: 3/5 — Offers a company and product blog.
- **Whistic**: 3/5 — Offers a company and product blog.

### Workflow automation
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — [Risk Automations](https://www.upguard.com/product/risk-automations) turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.

### Artificial intelligence features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.

### API and integrations
- **UpGuard**: 4/5 — A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.
- **Prevalent**: 2/5 — Integrates with ServiceNow.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Integrates with RiskRecon, Active Directory, Okta, and OneLogin.

### Purchasing & licensing transparency
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use [Trust Exchange](https://www.upguard.com/product/trust-exchange), UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.
- **Prevalent**: 1/5 — Pricing not available on the website.
- **Whistic**: 1/5 — Public pricing information is not available.

### Customers
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read [UpGuard’s customer stories](https://www.upguard.com/customers) to learn more.
- **Prevalent**: 5/5 — Customers include Iron Mountain, Pfizer, London Stock Exchange, Herbert Smith Freehills, and Ford.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Customers include Betterment, Invision, Airbnb, Zynga, and Robinhood

### G2 rating
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.5/5 — More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
- **Prevalent**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 21 reviews.
- **Whistic**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 46 reviews.

## Reviews

### Gartner Peer Insights
_Overall ratings for the IT VRM Solutions market. Accurate as of January 2024_
- **UpGuard**: 4.4/5 — 4.4, based on 160 reviews. **Named a Representative Vendor** in the 2022 Gartner Market Guide for IT VRM Solutions

### G2 rating
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.5/5 — More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
- **Prevalent**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 21 reviews.
- **Whistic**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 46 reviews.

### Glassdoor
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.4/5 — 4.4, based on 95 reviews.

## Overview
The news cycle is full of third-party [data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-breach) and [data leaks](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-leak). And for a good reason, they often expose the [protected health information (PHI)](https://www.upguard.com/blog/protected-health-information-phi) and [personally identifiable information (PII)](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) of thousands or even hundreds of millions of people.

Cyber attacks and misconfiguration are more common than ever before. Organizations need to invest in tools to [prevent data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/prevent-data-breaches) and reduce [cybersecurity risk](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cybersecurity-risk): particularly risks that involve third and [fourth-parties](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-is-fourth-party-risk).

Third-party data breaches put significant strain on organizations' resources, with recent estimates of the [average cost of a third-party data breach as high as $4.29 million](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cost-of-data-breach).

It's safe to say [vendor risk management (VRM)](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management) has become a top priority for CISOs and other members of senior management, even at the Board level. Beyond financial costs, breaches also cause significant regulatory and reputational impact, driven by the introduction of general data protection laws.

In the United States, California has introduced CCPA, Florida has introduced [FIPA](https://www.upguard.com/blog/fipa), and New York has launched the [SHIELD Act](https://www.upguard.com/blog/shield-act).

Every state, territory, and country wants to protect the [PII](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) and [PHI](https://www.upguard.com/blog/protected-health-information-phi) of its constituents. The European Union's GDPR has been the driver, and countries like Brazil with LGPD are following the EU's lead by introducing their general data protection laws.

The other trend to consider is these laws have broadened the scope of what [sensitive data](https://www.upguard.com/blog/sensitive-data) is. Small security incidents are becoming reportable data breaches. Data breach notification laws are increasing the impact of poor [cybersecurity risk management](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cybersecurity-risk-management).

Outside of these macro trends, InfoSec and security teams have more than ever before. Not only must you develop vendor management programs, manage security postures, and develop information security policies. You now need to translate [vendor risk assessments](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-assessment-questionnaire-template), [standardized questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires), and self-assessments into terms non-technical stakeholders can understand.

The good news for many security professionals is there is a load of tools that can help. A quick Google search will produce thousands of results, and the issue is deciding on which ones to assess.

That's why we wrote this post to provide you with a clear comparison between Prevalent, Whistic, and [UpGuard](https://www.upguard.com/), so you can make an informed decision and choose the tool that is right for you.

### Prevalent Overview

Prevalent is a Phoenix-based company that enables you to reveal and reduce vendor risk with its 360-degree [third-party risk management platform](https://www.upguard.com/product/vendorrisk).

Prevalent's cybersecurity risk rating solution helps organizations manage and monitor the security threats and risks associated with [third and fourth-party vendors](https://www.upguard.com/blog/third-party-vendor).

Third-party risk management, [vendor risk management](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management), data privacy, internal IT & cybersecurity assessment, and vendors use their tools.

*Prevalent UI. Source: prevalent.net*

### Whistic Overview

Whistic, Inc is based in Salt Lake City, Utah, and aims to help companies hold each other accountable for protecting their shared data. Whistic's CEO is Nick Sorensen.

The Whistic platform helps customers conduct and respond to security reviews in a single platform.

Their platform has tools to help you onboard, assess, and track vendors, allowing you to compare third-parties against a set of predefined criteria based on [vendor questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires), documentation, and metadata.

Vendors can evaluate themselves against one of the [top vendor questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires) and publish it to their profile, along with supporting documentation including audits and certifications.

*Whistic UI. Source: whistic.com*

## Usability and the learning curve
The usability and learning curve of a product can play a large part in your decision. Not only can they help you get up to speed quicker, but they can also improve return on investment and general joy using the product.

Prevalent, Whistic, and UpGuard offer their services via SaaS and are accessible from web-based platforms that can help you find, assess, and monitor vendors.

- **Prevalent:** Risks detailed on each point-in-time vendor assessment, as well as cybersecurity risk ratings.
- **Whistic:** Surfacing risks rely on point-in-time vendor assessments, which means new threats can go unidentified until the next assessment process. Remediation requests are not available. Their risk assessments align with the [VSA questionnaire](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-security-alliance-questionnaire), The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)'s [CAIQ](https://www.upguard.com/blog/caiq), [SIG](https://www.upguard.com/blog/sig-questionnaire), [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.upguard.com/blog/nist-cybersecurity-framework), [CIS Security Controls](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cis-controls), and Privacy Shield Framework.
- **UpGuard:** High-level summation of risk with the ability to drill down into precise technical details. Each risk is prioritized based on extensive research conducted by our in-house security team, and where possible, we provide remediation and protection suggestions. Additionally, we have a library of pre-built questionnaires that can be sent and managed with the UpGuard platform, including a pandemic (e.g., COVID-19), ISO 27001, PCI DSS, [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.upguard.com/blog/nist-cybersecurity-framework), CCPA, and Modern Slavery questionnaires. Read our full [guide on the top security questionnaires here](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires).

## Capabilities
Prevalent uses a combination of point-in-time risk assessments with automated monitoring for cyber threats to produce a [security rating](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-are-security-ratings). They help automate parts of the risk assessment process and have an exchange where completed vendor risk reports can be shared.

In contrast, Whistic relies on point-in-time risk assessment of [third-party vendors](https://www.upguard.com/blog/third-party-vendor) to determine enterprise risk and primarily focuses on the results of vendor security assessments.

Like Prevalent, UpGuard takes a combined approach using risk assessments and security ratings to provide a holistic view of an organization's security risk.

As you know, it can be hard to get risk assessments completed by time-poor vendors, and when they do, the results can be subjective and are rendered inaccurate over time as new security issues emerge.

Risk assessments do provide valuable information that can be missed by security ratings, which is why a combined approach is best.

For reference, security ratings provide a data-driven, instantaneous, and always up-to-date measurement of an organization's external security posture. When paired with risk assessments, they offer a comprehensive overview of an organization's internal and external security performance.

According to [Gartner](https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3884271/innovation-insight-for-security-rating-services),*cybersecurity ratings will become as important as credit ratings when assessing the risk of existing and new business relationships…these services will become a precondition for business relationships and part of the standard of due care for providers and procurers of services. Additionally, the services will have expanded their scope to assess other areas, such as cyber insurance, due diligence for M&A, and even as a raw metric for internal security programs.*

And [Forrester](https://www.forrester.com/report/Cybersecurity+Risk+Ratings+Market+Outlook+2020+And+Beyond/-/E-RES158178) *expects cybersecurity ratings to become a de facto standard in the boardroom by 2025. Investors and traditional debt ratings agencies will include cybersecurity as a risk factor for rating the ability to repay company debt (influenced in part by the cybersecurity ratings market).*

[Read our full guide on security ratings to understand all their use cases](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-are-security-ratings).

- **Prevalent:** Provides a risk rating between 0 and 100.
- **Whistic:** Relies on standardized security questionnaires.
- **UpGuard:** Provides a score between 0 and 950 along with the following letter grades, A: 801-950, B: 601-800, C: 401-600, D: 201-400, F: 0-200. You can [request your free security rating by clicking here](https://www.upguard.com/instant-security-score).

### Prevalent vs. Whistic: Risk Assessment Methodology

Each service relies on its proprietary risk assessment methodology to assess the potential risk introduced by a vendor.

Prevalent uses a combination of point-in-time risk assessments with their security ratings to determine the level of risk presented by a vendor. Risk assessments can be shared on the platform by vendors for other customers to use.

In contrast, Whistic focuses on conducting and responding to security reviews. Whistic helps remove inefficiencies in third-party risk management programs for organizations and their vendors alike, rather than completing the same questionnaire over and over, they can choose to publish it to their security profile.

The standardization of security assessment practices against recognized security frameworks, and making the results easily shareable helps all businesses save time, resources, and increases trust in the supply chain.

That's why UpGuard, like Prevalent and Whistic, has introduced a way for customers to save time and money by publishing completed security assessments and supporting documentation to the platform.

Additionally, UpGuard's platform provides real-time risk monitoring capabilities, integrated vendor processes, and data leak detection to provide businesses with a complete solution.

- **Prevalent:** Augments point-in-time risk assessments with security ratings to provide an overview of third and fourth-party risk.
- **Whistic:** Relies on point-in-time risk assessments that can become outdated until the next assessment process.
- **UpGuard:** Augments point-in-time risk assessments with security ratings to ensure information is always up-to-date. Our security ratings algorithm runs hundreds of individual checks including [email security](https://www.upguard.com/blog/email-security) and [email spoofing](https://www.upguard.com/blog/email-spoofing) risks (SPF, DKIM, and [DMARC](https://www.upguard.com/blog/dmarc)), website security (SSL, HSTS, header exposure), [phishing](https://www.upguard.com/blog/phishing) and malware risk, explicit checks for 200 services across thousands of ports (mail, app, user auth, file sharing, voice, administration, database, unidentified, and [open ports](https://www.upguard.com/blog/open-port)), [domain hijacking](https://www.upguard.com/blog/domain-hijacking) risk ([DNSSEC](https://www.upguard.com/blog/dnssec) and domain registry issues), reputational risks (CEO rating and employee rating), credential management (exposure to known data breaches and [data leaks](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-leak) detected by our data leak detection engine). We give each identified issue a risk prioritization category, so you know what to focus on first.

### Prevalent vs. Whistic: Scope

Even small vendors can lead to [significant data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/biggest-data-breaches). Just look at [Target's HVAC vendor](https://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/02/target-hackers-broke-in-via-hvac-company/) that eventually led to the exposure of credit card and [personal data](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) on more than 110 million consumers.

Not every solution provides the same level of coverage. If your organization employs small specialist vendors, ensure the solution covers them. As you know, it is best practice to monitor any vendor that handles sensitive data continuously.

- **Prevalent:** Unknown
- **Whistic:** Unknown
- **UpGuard:** 2,000,000 organizations scanned daily, and customers can automatically add new vendors.

## Community support
Prevalent, Whistic, and UpGuard all invest heavily in community support and try to make it as easy as possible for customers and prospects to get up to speed, reduce their operational overhead, and decide on which tool is right for them.

Each company has its blog that is a useful source of information for cybersecurity awareness training and [vendor risk management best practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management-best-practices). Only UpGuard has published [robust data breach and data leak research](https://www.upguard.com/breaches).

- **Prevalent:** Company and product blog.
- **Whistic:** Company and product blog.
- **UpGuard:** The UpGuard [cybersecurity and risk management blog](https://www.upguard.com/blog) is updated four times a week, and our [breach research blog](https://www.upguard.com/breaches) has uncovered and secured some of the most significant [data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/biggest-data-breaches).

## Release rate
Information technology is in constant flux, so the [information security controls](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cis-controls) designed to protect it need to adapt to keep up with it, and this is why [vendor risk management best practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management-best-practices) are always changing.

[New vulnerabilities](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vulnerability) are added to [CVE](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cve) every day, and attackers find new [zero-day exploits](https://www.upguard.com/blog/zero-day) that make traditional security controls invalid.

[CVE](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cve) adds new [vulnerabilities](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vulnerability) daily, attackers find new ways to exploit programming errors, and security controls become invalid regularly.

Your security tools need to be able to incorporate further information for you to be able to rely on them.

UpGuard has adopted DevOps principles internally to develop, test, and release software continuously, ensuring fast, consistent, and thoroughly tested releases.

## Pricing and support
The third-party risk management software industry is expensive. Vendors often use opaque pricing policies designed to take power away from the purchaser.

With that said, most vendor risk solutions will be priced on a per vendor, per year basis except for fixed-price, one-off reports.

We weren't able to find any publicly available pricing on Prevalent. Whistic's pricing appears to start at $25,000, so if you're a small company, you may not be able to afford what seems to be an enterprise pricing strategy.

- **Prevalent:** Public pricing information is not available.
- **Whistic:** Reported to start at $25,000 and based on the number of vendors managed in the platform or the number of security questionnaires you're responding to.
- **UpGuard:** UpGuard has a transparent pricing model which [you can view here](/pricing). UpGuard pricing starts at $5k/year and scales with your company. If you have any questions, please let us know via [sales@upguard.com](mailto:sales@upguard.com) and we will follow up.

## API and extensibility
While Prevalent, Whistic, and UpGuard have their platforms, you may want to access resources in a different platform or consolidate statistics into a proprietary centralized dashboard.

In this situation, an API can help. The good news is each provides a standard API.

## Third-party integrations
APIs are great if you have access to technical talent, but not all vendor risk management teams do. Without developers, you're more reliant on the company's partner ecosystem and third-party integrations.

- **Prevalent:** Integrates with ServiceNow.
- **Whistic:** Integrates with RiskRecon, Active Directory, Okta, and OneLogin.
- **UpGuard:** Integrates with GRC platforms, ticketing systems like ServiceNow, and more.

## Customers
Often the proof comes from the customer. Prevalent, Whistic, and UpGuard all have impressive customer lists, and none are more impressive than the other.

- **Prevalent:** Customers include Iron Mountain, Pfizer, London Stock Exchange, Herbert Smith Freehills, and Ford.
- **Whistic:** Customers include Betterment, Invision, Airbnb, Zynga, and Robinhood.
- **UpGuard:** Customers include NASA, the New York Stock Exchange (ICE), Morningstar, Akamai, Bill.com, IAG, and ADP. [Read our customer case studies here](https://www.upguard.com/customers), and our [Gartner reviews here](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/it-vendor-risk-management/vendor/upguard).

Here's what a few UpGuard customers had to say about their experience. You can read more on [Gartner reviews](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/it-vendor-risk-management/vendor/upguard).

- "UpGuard has given us a view of our vendor security posture. The ability to launch a questionnaire or ask for a plan of remediation for items that show as vulnerable is also a great added value and a time saver. UpGuard is also very customer focused. They respond quickly to issues and questions and welcome any input that could improve the product. Overall it is one of the best value add tools we have."
- "The simplicity of the product is fantastic. My team and I were able to be up and running in minutes. We monitor risks on over 25 vendors in near real-time and use these statistics to report to the C suite and Board of Directors. Upguard has become part of the critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon."
- "The ease of use and simplicity of the product is excellent. We were able to be up and running with 50 vendors within minutes, not hours. The reporting is used for monthly statistics and is reported to our Senior Management. Upguard has become an integral part of our critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon."

## Security rating
Finally, let's take a look at how Prevalent, Whistic, and UpGuard compare when assessed by UpGuard's platform on July 28, 2020. It's important to note that UpGuard adheres to the Principles of Fair and Accurate Security Ratings:

- **Transparency:** UpGuard believes in providing full and timely openness not only to our customers but to any organization that wants to understand their security posture, which is why you can [request your free security rating here](https://www.upguard.com/instant-security-score). You can also [book a free trial of our platform here](https://www.upguard.com/demo).
- **Dispute, Correction, and Appeal:** UpGuard is committed to working with customers, vendors, and any organization that believes their score is not accurate or outdated.
- **Accuracy and Validation: UpGuard's** security ratings are empirical, data-driven, and based on independently verifiable and accessible information.
- **Model Governance:** The datasets and methodologies used to calculate our security ratings can change from time to time to better reflect our understanding of how to mitigate cybersecurity risk. When they do, we provide reasonable notice and explanation to our customers about the impact on their security rating.
- **Independence:** No commercial agreement or lack thereof, gives an organization the ability to improve its security rating without enhancing their security posture.
- **Confidentiality:** Any information disclosed to UpGuard during a challenged rating or dispute is appropriately protected. Nor do we provide third-parties with sensitive or confidential information on rated organizations that could lead to system compromise.

---
Full interactive comparison: https://www.upguard.com/compare/prevalent-vs-whistic