# RiskRecon vs Whistic: 2025 Comparison

> This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/compare/riskrecon-vs-whistic](https://www.upguard.com/compare/riskrecon-vs-whistic), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Ratings, security scores and pricing details reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive comparison.

Compare the capabilities and features of RiskRecon and Whistic. See which solution performs best across a range of categories.

## Platforms compared
- UpGuard (UpGuard — publisher of this comparison)
- RiskRecon
- Whistic

## Feature-by-feature comparison: RiskRecon vs Whistic

### General summary
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — RiskRecon specializes in external security monitoring and asset attribution with strong accuracy and strong cloud scanning capabilities, which are particularly valuable for IT-centric organizations. Owned by Mastercard, RiskRecon has stable financial backing and solid scanning accuracy. However, it remains primarily focused on external scan strengths and takes a partnership-first approach to TPRM workflows.
- **Whistic**: 2/5 — Relies on standardized security questionnaires.

### Key strengths
- **UpGuard**: UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.
- **RiskRecon**: RiskRecon provides a notably accurate external scanning solution and offers practical remediation guidance. It even prioritizes vulnerabilities by asset value for IT teams.

### Key weaknesses
- **UpGuard**: UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.
- **RiskRecon**: RiskRecon takes a partnership and integration-first approach to vendor assessment workflows. This necessitates the adoption of an additional solution provider to achieve an optimal assessment experience, as supported by the RiskRecon platform.

### Usability and learning curve
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — RiskRecon is focused on delivering clear, actionable findings for IT and SecOps-centric security teams with a clean interface for surfacing and remediating risks. While its limited scope of purely external scan data can simplify usage, complications can quickly arise for those integrating RiskRecon with a partner provider for assessment workflows.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Risks detailed on each point-in-time vendor assessment, which means new risks are only detected during the next assessment process. Remediation requests are not available. Their risk assessments are aligned to the VSA questionnaire, CAIQ, SIG, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, CIS Security Controls, and Privacy Shield Framework.

### Cyber risk data accuracy
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. [Threat Monitoring](https://www.upguard.com/product/breach-risk/threat-monitoring) scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.
- **RiskRecon**: 5/5 — RiskRecon is well regarded for accurate asset attribution, resulting in reliable and actionable insights.
- **Whistic**: 2/5 — Relies on risk assessments which can quickly become out of date as new zero-day exploits are discovered and new IT infrastructure is used. The truth is that questionnaires, much like penetration testing, can be subjective and become inaccurate over time as new security issues emerge. Additionally, Whistic provides no controls for capturing data loss incidents.

### Vendor risk management features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. [AI-powered security questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/product/vendor-risk/questionnaire-management) read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.
- **RiskRecon**: 2/5 — RiskRecon focuses on external scanning to calculate vendor risk and relies on partner integrations to offer risk assessment workflows, resulting in additional costs.

### Attack surface management features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.
- **RiskRecon**: 2/5 — RiskRecon focuses on high-accuracy external scanning and asset discovery, offering precise identification of vulnerabilities.

### Security ratings
- **UpGuard**: A grade (943/950), live UpGuard security rating
- **RiskRecon**: A grade (926/950), live UpGuard security rating
- **Whistic**: A grade (833/950), live UpGuard security rating

### Customer support
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite [responsive, hands-on support](https://www.upguard.com/customer-support) as a reason they continue with UpGuard.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — RiskRecon offers stable support with detailed product documentation and guides available.
- **Whistic**: 3/5 — Offers a company and product blog.

### Workflow automation
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — [Risk Automations](https://www.upguard.com/product/risk-automations) turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.
- **RiskRecon**: 2/5 — It primarily automates external scanning and asset discovery, generating action plans and prioritized remediations. However, it lacks built-in automation for the end-to-end assessment cycle, relying on integrations or manual processes.

### Artificial intelligence features
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — Risk Recon uses AI to primarily support the detection of potential risks and vulnerabilities in supplier security postures. However, its use of AI to support vendor assessments highly depends on capabilities made available by partner providers.

### API and integrations
- **UpGuard**: 4/5 — A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.
- **RiskRecon**: 3/5 — RiskRecon features basic integration options for exporting findings and connecting with ticketing systems or GRC solutions. Offers integrations with GRC platforms, such as RSA Archer, Sigma Ratings, Whistic, and more.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Integrates with RiskRecon, Active Directory, Okta, and OneLogin.

### Purchasing & licensing transparency
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use [Trust Exchange](https://www.upguard.com/product/trust-exchange), UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — Public pricing is not available. Does not publically offer a free trial.
- **Whistic**: 1/5 — Public pricing information is not available.

### Customers
- **UpGuard**: 5/5 — UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read [UpGuard’s customer stories](https://www.upguard.com/customers) to learn more.
- **RiskRecon**: 5/5 — Major customers include Informatica, Tufts Health Plan, the University of San Francisco, and Sentara.
- **Whistic**: 4/5 — Customers include Betterment, Invision, Airbnb, Zynga, and Robinhood

### G2 rating
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.5/5 — More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
- **RiskRecon**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 2 reviews.
- **Whistic**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 46 reviews.

## Reviews

### Gartner Peer Insights
_Overall ratings for the IT VRM Solutions market. Accurate as of January 2024_
- **UpGuard**: 4.4/5 — 4.4, based on 160 reviews. **Named a Representative Vendor** in the 2022 Gartner Market Guide for IT VRM Solutions
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — 4.2, based on 61 reviews

### G2 rating
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.5/5 — More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
- **RiskRecon**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 2 reviews.
- **Whistic**: 4.5/5 — 4.5, based on 46 reviews.

### Glassdoor
_Accurate as of March 2025_
- **UpGuard**: 4.4/5 — 4.4, based on 95 reviews.
- **RiskRecon**: 4/5 — 3.8, based on 19 reviews.

## Overview
Organizations are taking on more [cyber risk](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cybersecurity-risk) than ever before and a large part comes in the form of [third-party](https://www.upguard.com/blog/manage-third-party-risk) and [fourth-party risk](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-is-fourth-party-risk). The news is inundated with [data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-breach) and [data leaks](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-leak) and [the average cost of a data breach has reached nearly $4 million globally](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cost-of-data-breach). It's safe to say that the financial cost alone is enough proof to start investing in [tools to prevent data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/prevent-data-breaches).

The unfortunate truth is third-parties cause data breaches. That's why [cybersecurity](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cyber-security) and [vendor risk management (VRM)](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management) has become a top priority for CISOs, Vice Presidents of Security, security professionals, and other members of senior management, even at the Board level.

In addition to financial costs, there are increased regulatory and reputational costs.

Governments are enacting laws and regulations designed to promote, or require, [third-party cyber risk management programs](https://www.upguard.com/blog/third-party-risk-management-framework) to identify, assess, [mitigate and oversee risks created by vendors](https://www.upguard.com/blog/manage-third-party-risk), [fourth-parties](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-is-fourth-party-risk), and customers.

While this is BAU for some industries, it's a new problem to tackle for many others. The introduction of general data protection laws means most organizations need to follow [vendor risk management best practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management-best-practices).

For example in the United States California has introduced CCPA and Florida has introduced [FIPA](https://www.upguard.com/blog/fipa) to protect the [personally identifiable information](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) of their constituents. Outside of the United States, GDPR, [LGPD](https://www.upguard.com/blog/lgpd), and [PIPEDA](https://www.upguard.com/blog/pipeda) are three important extraterritorial laws from the European Union, Brazil, and Canada respectively. Alongside the protection of [PII](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) and [PHI](https://www.upguard.com/blog/protected-health-information-phi), many of these laws have introduced mandatory data breach notification requirements which have greatly increased the reputational impact of inadequate [vendor and cybersecurity risk management practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cybersecurity-risk-management).

To add to this, security teams have more expected to not only manage and improve [security postures](https://www.upguard.com/blog/security-posture) and [information security policies](https://www.upguard.com/blog/information-security-policy), but to translate technical details from cybersecurity risk assessments and [vendor questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires) into terms that non-technical stakeholders can understand.

The good news is third-party risk management tools can help you do exactly that. The issue is it's hard to decide on which ones to assess, let alone what criteria to assess them against.

That's why we wrote this post to provide you with a clear comparison between RiskRecon, Whistic, and [UpGuard](https://www.upguard.com/), so you can make an informed decision and choose the tool that is right for you.

### RiskRecon Overview

RiskRecon is headquartered in Salt Lake City, UT with a presence in Boston, MA and representatives around the world. RiskRecon is lead by its CEO and Co-founder Kelly White.

They makes it easy to gain deep, risk contextualized insight into the [cybersecurity risk performance](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cybersecurity-performance-management) of all third-parties by continuously monitoring across 11 security domains and 41 security criteria.

Like UpGuard, it can be used for third-party risk management, enterprise risk management, and mergers & acquisitions.

*Riskrecon UI. Source: riskrecon.com*

### Whistic Overview

Whistic, Inc is based in Salt Lake City, Utah and aims to help companies hold each other accountable for protecting their shared data. Whistic's CEO is Nick Sorensen.

The Whistic platform helps customers conduct and respond to security reviews in a single platform.

Their platform has tools to help you onboard, assess, and track vendors, allowing you to compare third-parties against a set of predefined criteria based on [vendor questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires), documentation, and metadata.

Vendors can assess themselves against one of the [top vendor questionnaires](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires) and publish it to their profile, along with supporting documentation including audits and certifications.

*Whistic UI. Source: whistic.com*

## Usability and the learning curve
User experience and design play a large part in how quickly you can get up to speed and start getting your money's worth.

RiskRecon, Whistic, and UpGuard offer their services via SaaS and are accessible from web-based platforms that can help you find, assess, and monitor vendors.

- **RiskRecon:** Provides risk prioritization based on your configured policy.
- **Whistic:** Risks detailed on each point-in-time vendor assessment, which means new risks are only detected during the next assessment process. Remediation requests are not available. Their risk assessments are aligned to the [VSA questionnaire](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-security-alliance-questionnaire), [CAIQ](https://www.upguard.com/blog/caiq), [SIG](https://www.upguard.com/blog/sig-questionnaire), [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.upguard.com/blog/nist-cybersecurity-framework), [CIS Security Controls](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cis-controls), and Privacy Shield Framework.
- **UpGuard:** High-level summation of risk with the ability to drill down into precise technical details. Each risk is prioritized based on extensive research conducted by our in-house security team, and where possible remediation and protection suggestions are provided. Additionally, we have a library of pre-built questionnaires that can be sent and managed with the UpGuard platform including a pandemic (e.g. COVID-19), ISO 27001, PCI DSS, [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.upguard.com/blog/nist-cybersecurity-framework), CCPA, and Modern Slavery questionnaires. Read our full [guide on the top security questionnaires here](https://www.upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-assessment-questionnaires).

## Capabilities
RiskRecon provides security ratings that aggregate different risks into a single risk rating that allows for immediate and easy comparison of different organizations, [third-party vendors, business units, and service providers](https://www.upguard.com/blog/third-party-vendor).

Whistic relies on point-in-time risk assessment to determine enterprise risk and primarily focuses on the results of standardized questionnaires.

UpGuard uses risk assessments and security ratings to provide a holistic overview of an organization's security risk. As you likely know, it can be hard to get a time-poor vendor to complete a questionnaire, and when they do, the results are subjective and are rendered inaccurate over time as new security issues emerge.

They do, however, provide valuable information that security ratings cannot generally provide, that is, internal security issues and controls.

Additionally, security ratings provide a data-driven, instantaneous, and always up-to-date measurement of an organization's external security posture. Together, they provide an excellent overview of an organization's internal and external security performance.

According to [Gartner](https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3884271/innovation-insight-for-security-rating-services),*cybersecurity ratings will become as important as credit ratings when assessing the risk of existing and new business relationships…these services will become a precondition for business relationships and part of the standard of due care for providers and procurers of services. Additionally, the services will have expanded their scope to assess other areas, such as cyber insurance, due diligence for M&A and even as a raw metric for internal security programs.*

[Read our full guide on security ratings to understand all their use cases](https://www.upguard.com/blog/what-are-security-ratings).

- **RiskRecon:** RiskRecon distills its assessment criteria into a simple score from 0-10.
- **Whistic:** Relies on standardized security questionnaires.
- **UpGuard:** Provides a score between 0 and 950 along with the following letter grades, A: 801-950, B: 601-800, C: 401-600, D: 201-400, F: 0-200. You can [request your free security rating by clicking here](https://www.upguard.com/instant-security-score).

### RiskRecon vs. Whistic: Risk Assessment Methodology

Each service relies on a different risk assessment methodology to assess the potential risk of an IT vendor. RiskRecon relies on misconfiguration scanning. This means they look at an organization's Internet footprint to determine how it compares to best practices and what security gaps could lead to successful [cyber attacks](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cyber-attack) on an organization's [confidentiality, integrity, or availability](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cia-triad).

Whistic is focused on conducting and responding to security reviews. This is designed to remove inefficiencies in third-party risk management programs for organizations and their vendors alike, rather than completing the same questionnaire over and over, they can choose to publish it to their security profile.

UpGuard takes a combined approach. We believe the standardization of security assessment practices against recognized security frameworks, as well as making attestations easily shareable is great and helps organizations save time, money, and increases trust in the supply chain.

That's why we've also introduced a security assessment exchange that allows our customers to create a security profile that lists out supporting information like a [SOC 2 report](https://www.upguard.com/blog/soc-2) or completed security questionnaires.

We also believe that scanning for misconfiguration and security issues is just as important. That's why we also add critical risk monitoring capabilities, integrated vendor processes, and accessibility to provide you with a complete solution for your risk and compliance needs.

Think of UpGuard as a combination of Whistic and RiskRecon. Our platform can help determine [potential attack vectors](https://www.upguard.com/blog/attack-vector) and [vulnerabilities](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vulnerability) that lead to [data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-breach).

- **RiskRecon:** Assesses an organization against 11 security domains and 41 security criteria
- **Whistic:** Relies on point-in-time risk assessments that can become outdated until the next assessment process.
- **UpGuard:** Augments point-in-time risk assessments with security ratings to ensure information is always up-to-date. Our security ratings algorithm runs hundreds of individual checks including [email security](https://www.upguard.com/blog/email-security) and [email spoofing](https://www.upguard.com/blog/email-spoofing) risks (SPF, DKIM, and [DMARC](https://www.upguard.com/blog/dmarc)), website security (SSL, HSTS, header exposure), [phishing](https://www.upguard.com/blog/phishing) and malware risk, explicit checks for 200 services across thousands of ports (mail, app, user auth, file sharing, voice, administration, database, unidentified, and [open ports](https://www.upguard.com/blog/open-port)), [domain hijacking](https://www.upguard.com/blog/domain-hijacking) risk ([DNSSEC](https://www.upguard.com/blog/dnssec) and domain registry issues), reputational risks (CEO rating and employee rating), credential management (exposure to known data breaches and [data leaks](https://www.upguard.com/blog/data-leak) detected by our data leak detection engine). Each identified issue is given a risk prioritization category so you know what represents the highest risk.

### RiskRecon vs. Whistic: Scope

As you know, even small vendors can lead to [large data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/biggest-data-breaches), e.g. the HVAC vendor that eventually led to Target's exposure of credit card and [personal data](https://www.upguard.com/blog/personally-identifiable-information-pii) on more than 110 million consumers.

Not every solution provides the same level of coverage. If your organization employs small specialist vendors they may not be covered by a solution. As you know, any vendor that handles sensitive data is a potential risk that should be continuously monitored and accounted for.

- **RiskRecon:** unknown
- **Whistic:** Unknown
- **UpGuard:** 2,000,000 organizations scanned daily and new vendors can be automatically added by customers.

## Community support
RiskRecon, Whistic, and UpGuard all invest in their community and try to make it as easy as possible for customers and prospects to get up to speed, reduce operational overhead, and decide on the right product for them.

Each company has its own blog that is a useful source of information for cybersecurity awareness training, as well as [vendor risk management best practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management-best-practices).

- **RiskRecon:** Company and product blog.
- **Whistic:** Company and product blog.
- **UpGuard:** The UpGuard [cybersecurity and risk management blog](https://www.upguard.com/blog) is updated four times a week and our [breach research blog](https://www.upguard.com/breaches) has uncovered and secured some of the [largest data breaches](https://www.upguard.com/blog/biggest-data-breaches).

## Release rate
[InfoSec](https://www.upguard.com/blog/information-security) needs to constantly adapt and change to keep up with changes with the information and technology it is designed to protect. This means [vendor risk management best practices](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vendor-risk-management-best-practices) are constantly changing too.

New [vulnerabilities](https://www.upguard.com/blog/vulnerability) are added to [CVE](https://www.upguard.com/blog/cve) on a daily basis, attackers find new ways to exploit programming errors, and security controls become invalid constantly.

You need to be able to rely on your security tooling, and that means they need to be able to incorporate changes quickly.

UpGuard has adopted DevOps principles internally to develop, test, and release software on a continuous basis, ensuring fast, consistent, and safe releases that are thoroughly tested.

## Pricing and support
Software can be expensive, especially third-party risk management software. The industry often uses opaque pricing policies designed to take power away from the purchaser. Vendor risk solutions are typically priced on a per vendor, per year basis except in some cases where reports can be generated for a fixed price.

RiskRecon and Whistic are more expensive than UpGuard. Their high prices can price out small to medium-size businesses and relegate large organizations to managing only their most at-risk vendors.

- **RiskRecon:** Public pricing information is not available. Pricing is reported to start at $10,000 and increases based on the number of vendors monitored.
- **Whistic:** Reported to start at $25,000 and is based on the number of vendors managed in the platform or the number of security questionnaires to which you're responding.
- **UpGuard:** UpGuard has a transparent pricing model which [you can view here](/pricing). UpGuard pricing starts at $5k/year and scales with your company. If you have any questions, please let us know via [sales@upguard.com](mailto:sales@upguard.com) and we will follow up.

## API and extensibility
While RiskRecon, Whistic, and UpGuard have their own platforms, customers may want to access the resources on a different platform or consolidate reporting into a centralized dashboard.

The good news is all services offer standard APIs to pull data.

## Third-party integrations
APIs are useful for technical staff, but not all vendor risk management teams have access to developers. This is why standard third-party integrations are an important part of decision-making.

- **RiskRecon:** Offers integrations with GRC platforms such as RSA Archer, Sigma Ratings, Whistic, and more.
- **Whistic:** Integrates with RiskRecon, Active Directory, Okta, and onelogin.
- **UpGuard:** Integrates with GRC platforms, ticketing systems like ServiceNow, and more.

## Customers
The best proof comes from each solution's customers. RiskRecon, Whistic, and UpGuard all have impressive customer lists, none more distinguished than the other.

- **RiskRecon:** Customers include Informatica, Tufts Health Plan, University of San Francisco, and Sentara.
- **Whistic:** Customers include Betterment, Invision, Airbnb, Zynga, and Robinhood.
- **UpGuard:** Customers include NASA, the New York Stock Exchange (ICE), Morningstar, Akamai, Bill.com, IAG, and ADP. [Read our customer case studies here](https://www.upguard.com/customers) and our [Gartner reviews here](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/it-vendor-risk-management/vendor/upguard).

Here's what a few UpGuard customers had to say about their experience. You can read more on [Gartner reviews](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/it-vendor-risk-management/vendor/upguard).

- "UpGuard has given us a view of our vendor security posture. The ability to launch a questionnaire or ask for a plan of remediation for items that show as vulnerable is also a great added value and a time saver. UpGuard is also very customer focused. They respond quickly to issues and to questions and welcome any input that could improve the product. Overall it is one of the best value add tools we have."
- "The simplicity of the product is fantastic. My team and I were able to be up and running in minutes. We monitor risks on over 25 vendors in near real-time and use these statistics to report to the C suite and Board of Directors. Upguard has become part of the critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon."
- "The ease of use and simplicity of the product is excellent. We were able to be up and running with 50 vendors within minutes not hours. The reporting is used for monthly statistics and is reported to our Senior Management. Upguard has become an integral part of our critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon."

## Security rating
Finally, let's take a look at how RiskRecon, Whistic, and UpGuard compare when assessed by UpGuard's platform on July 28, 2020. It's important to note that UpGuard adheres to the Principles of Fair and Accurate Security Ratings:

- **Transparency:** UpGuard believes in providing full and timely transparency not only to our customers but to any organization that wants to understand their security posture, which is why you can [request your free security rating here](https://www.upguard.com/instant-security-score) and you can [book a free trial of our platform here](https://www.upguard.com/demo).
- **Dispute, Correction, and Appeal:** UpGuard is committed to working with customers, vendors and any organization that believes their score is not accurate or outdated.
- **Accuracy and Validation:** UpGuard's security ratings are empirical, data-driven and based on independently verifiable and accessible information.
- **Model Governance:** While the datasets and methodologies used to calculate our security ratings can change from time to time to better reflect our understanding of how to mitigate cybersecurity risk, we provide reasonable notice and explanation to our customers about how their security rating may be impacted.
- **Independence:** No commercial agreement or lack thereof, gives an organization the ability to improve its security rating without improving their security posture.
- **Confidentiality:** Any information disclosed to UpGuard during the course of a challenged rating or dispute is appropriately protected. Nor do we provide third-parties with sensitive or confidential information on rated organizations that could lead to system compromise.

---
Full interactive comparison: https://www.upguard.com/compare/riskrecon-vs-whistic