# anshun Security Rating, Vendor Risk Report, and Data Breaches

> This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/security-report/anshun-electronics-hk-limited](https://www.upguard.com/security-report/anshun-electronics-hk-limited), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Security scores and check results reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive report.

Anshun Electronics (HK) Limited is an electronics company operating in Hong Kong. The company engages in the distribution, trading, or manufacturing of electronic components and related products for commercial and industrial applications.

## Overview
- Domain: anshun.com.hk
- Grade: F (Critical)
- Score: 113 / 950
- Last scan: August 22, 2026
- Industry: Manufacturing
- Website: https://www.anshun.com.hk

## Vendor risk summary
This vendor risk report is based on UpGuard's continuous monitoring of anshun's security posture using open-source, commercial, and proprietary threat intelligence feeds. The results are summarized into a security rating based on the analysis of hundreds of individual checks across five risk categories: website security, email security, phishing & malware, brand & reputation risk, and network security.

## Security categories

### Website Security

- Fail — Server information header exposed
  - Exposing information about the server version increases the ability of attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. The website configuration should be changed to prevent version information being revealed in the 'server' header.
- Fail — X-Frame-Options is not deny or sameorigin
  - Browsers may display this website's content in frames. This can lead to clickjacking attacks.
- Fail — CSP is not implemented
  - No valid Content Security Policy is implemented. This increases the risk of XSS and clickjacking attacks.
- Fail — X-Content-Type-Options is not nosniff
  - Browsers may interpret files as a different MIME type than what is specified in the Content-Type HTTP header. This can lead to MIME confusion attacks.
- Fail — Unmaintained page detected
  - This domain appears to be unmaintained based on indicators like page content or status code. Unmaintained pages expand the attack surface for malicious actors.
- Pass — X-Powered-By header not exposed
  - Information about specific technology used on the server is obscured.
- Pass — Referrer policy is not unsafe-url
  - The website's Referrer Policy is not configured to allow unsafe information to be sent in the referrer header.
- Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposing specific ASP.net version
  - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposing a specific version makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities.
- Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposed
  - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposed makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities.

### Email

- Fail — DMARC policy is p=none
  - DMARC policy is p=none. This provides no protection against fraudulent emails. The DMARC policy should be migrated to p=quarantine, and eventually p=reject.
- Fail — SPF policy uses ~all
  - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record is too lenient as to which domains are allowed to send email on the domain's behalf. This record should preferably not use the ~all mechanism, as this does not instruct the mail receiver to reject messages from unauthorised sources. When DMARC is not being enforced, -all should be used on the SPF record.
- Pass — DMARC policy exists
  - DMARC protects against fraudulent emails being sent from a domain.
- Pass — SPF enabled
  - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records prevent spammers from sending messages with forged addresses.
- Pass — SPF syntax correct
  - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record passes basic syntax checks.
- Pass — SPF ptr mechanism not used
  - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record does not include the ptr mechanism.

### Network

- Fail — 'FTP' port open
  - The 'FTP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed.
- Fail — 'IMAP' port open
  - The 'IMAP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed.
- Fail — 'POP3' port open
  - The 'POP3' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed.
- Fail — 'SMTP' port open
  - The 'SMTP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed.
- Fail — 'SSH' port open
  - The 'SSH' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed.

### DNS

- Fail — DNSSEC not enabled
  - DNSSEC records prevent third parties from forging the records that guarantee a domain's identity. DNSSEC should be configured for this domain.
- Fail — CAA not enabled
  - The domain does not contain a valid Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) record. A CAA record indicates which Certificate Authorities (CAs) are authorized to issue certificates for a domain.
- Pass — No unregistered MX records detected
  - No unregistered MX records that could lead to receiving mail on behalf of the target organization were detected.
- Pass — No subdomain takeover vulnerability detected
  - No dangling DNS records that could lead to subdomain takeover were detected.

### Encryption

- Fail — HTTP does not redirect to HTTPS
  - The domain is still accessible over HTTP. All HTTP requests should be redirected to HTTPS.
- Fail — Hostname does not match SSL certificate
  - The site's hostname does not match the SSL certificate. The domain name should be added to the certificate, either as a Subject Alternative Name or as the Common Name.
- Fail — SSL expired
  - SSL certificate has expired. The certificate will need to be renewed for connections to your domain to be trusted.
- Fail — Common Diffie-Hellman prime used in key exchange
  - Commonly used Diffie-Hellman primes smaller than 2048 bits are likely to have been broken by organized groups or nation-state actors, allowing passive eavesdropping on traffic. It is recommended to use a 2048 bit or stronger Diffie-Hellman prime.
- Fail — HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) not enforced
  - Without HSTS enforced, people browsing this site are more susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. The server should be configured to support HSTS.
- Fail — Insecure SSL/TLS versions available
  - Any version of the SSL protocol, and TLS prior to version 1.2, are now considered insecure. The server should disable support for these old protocols.
- Fail — Insecure cipher suite supported
  - Insecure cipher suites can be trivially broken by an attacker, allowing them to impersonate your server or eavesdrop on traffic.
- Pass — Certificate not found on our revoked certificate list
  - The site's certificate chain was checked against our list of revoked certificates.
- Pass — SSL available
  - SSL is supported for this site.
- Pass — Trusted SSL certificate
  - The certificate presented by this domain was issued by a trusted certificate authority.
- Pass — SSL certificate chain present in server response
  - A complete SSL certificate chain was presented by the server for this domain.
- Pass — SSL chain certificates do not expire within 20 days
  - SSL intermediate and root certificates do not expire within 20 days.
- Pass — SSL expiration period shorter than 398 days
  - The SSL certificate presented by the server has an expiration period shorter than 398 days.
- Pass — SSL has more than 20% of its valid period remaining
  - SSL certificate does not expire in less than 20% of its total valid period.
- Pass — Strong SSL algorithm
  - Industry standard SHA-256 encryption in use.
- Pass — Strong public certificate key length
  - The site's public certificate provides at least 112 bits of security strength.

### Data leakage

- Pass — No open cloud storage service detected
  - No cloud storage service configured to allow anonymous file listing was detected.
- Pass — Domain index is not a listable directory
  - The domain index is not a listable directory.

### IP/Domain Reputation

- Pass — Not a suspected malware provider
  - This website does not appear to contain malicious code.
- Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days.
- Pass — Not suspected of unwanted software
  - This website does not appear to be attempting to install unwanted software.
- Pass — Not a suspected phishing page
  - This site does not appear to be a forgery or imitation of another website.
- Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 90 days.

### Vulnerability Management

- Fail — End-of-life version of Apache HTTP Server detected
  - The detected version of Apache HTTP Server is end of life. The product will likely not receive security updates from the vendor moving forward.
- Fail — End-of-life version of OpenSSL detected
  - The detected version of OpenSSL is end of life. The product will likely not receive security updates from the vendor moving forward.
- Fail — Vulnerable to CVE-2014-3566 (POODLE)
  - The server supports SSLv3 and is therefore vulnerable to POODLE, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack.
- Fail — Apache HTTP Server 2.2.29 has potential vulnerabilities
  - Apache HTTP Server 2.2.29 has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk.
- Fail — Modssl Mod Ssl 2.2.29 has potential vulnerabilities
  - Modssl Mod Ssl 2.2.29 has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk.
- Fail — OpenSSL 1.0.2o has potential vulnerabilities
  - OpenSSL 1.0.2o has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk.
- Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2014-0160 (Heartbleed)
  - A bug in OpenSSL's implementation of the TLS heartbeat extension allows access to portions of memory on the targeted host e.g. cryptographic keys and passwords.
- Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2015-0204 (FREAK)
  - The server does not offer RSA_EXPORT cipher suites, so clients are not vulnerable to the FREAK attack.
- Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2015-4000 (Logjam)
  - The server is using strong Diffie-Hellman parameters and is not vulnerable to the Logjam attack.

---
Full interactive report: https://www.upguard.com/security-report/anshun-electronics-hk-limited
Security Reports Policy: https://www.upguard.com/security-report-policy
