# CEHL Security Rating, Vendor Risk Report, and Data Breaches

> This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/security-report/capital-environment](https://www.upguard.com/security-report/capital-environment), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Security scores and check results reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive report.

## Overview
- Domain: cehl.com.hk
- Grade: D (Poor)
- Score: 246 / 950
- Last scan: August 24, 2026
- Website: https://www.cehl.com.hk
- Location: Hong Kong, Hong Kong

## Vendor risk summary
This vendor risk report is based on UpGuard's continuous monitoring of CEHL's security posture using open-source, commercial, and proprietary threat intelligence feeds. The results are summarized into a security rating based on the analysis of hundreds of individual checks across five risk categories: website security, email security, phishing & malware, brand & reputation risk, and network security.

## Security categories

### Website Security

- Fail — Secure cookies not used
  - When secure cookies are not used, there is an increased risk of third parties intercepting information contained in these cookies. The website configuration should be changed so that all 'Set-Cookie' headers include 'secure'.
- Fail — Server information header exposed
  - Exposing information about the server version increases the ability of attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. The website configuration should be changed to prevent version information being revealed in the 'server' header.
- Fail — X-Powered-By header exposed
  - The X-Powered-By header reveals information about specific technology used on the server. This information can be used to exploit vulnerabilities. The server configuration should be changed to remove this header.
- Fail — X-Frame-Options is not deny or sameorigin
  - Browsers may display this website's content in frames. This can lead to clickjacking attacks.
- Fail — CSP is not implemented
  - No valid Content Security Policy is implemented. This increases the risk of XSS and clickjacking attacks.
- Fail — X-Content-Type-Options is not nosniff
  - Browsers may interpret files as a different MIME type than what is specified in the Content-Type HTTP header. This can lead to MIME confusion attacks.
- Pass — HttpOnly cookies used
  - Using HttpOnly cookies reduces the risk of client side script attacks, by preventing cookies being read on the client.
- Pass — Referrer policy is not unsafe-url
  - The website's Referrer Policy is not configured to allow unsafe information to be sent in the referrer header.
- Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposing specific ASP.net version
  - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposing a specific version makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities.
- Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposed
  - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposed makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities.
- Pass — No unmaintained page detected
  - The page appears to be maintained.

### Network

- Pass — No ports are open
  - No open ports were detected.

### DNS

- Fail — DNSSEC not enabled
  - DNSSEC records prevent third parties from forging the records that guarantee a domain's identity. DNSSEC should be configured for this domain.
- Pass — No subdomain takeover vulnerability detected
  - No dangling DNS records that could lead to subdomain takeover were detected.

### Encryption

- Fail — SSL not available
  - SSL is the standard encryption method for browsing websites. Enabling SSL requires installing an SSL certificate on the site.
- Fail — HTTP does not redirect to HTTPS
  - The domain is still accessible over HTTP. All HTTP requests should be redirected to HTTPS.

### Data leakage

- Pass — No open cloud storage service detected
  - No cloud storage service configured to allow anonymous file listing was detected.
- Pass — Domain index is not a listable directory
  - The domain index is not a listable directory.

### IP/Domain Reputation

- Pass — Not a suspected malware provider
  - This website does not appear to contain malicious code.
- Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days.
- Pass — Not suspected of unwanted software
  - This website does not appear to be attempting to install unwanted software.
- Pass — Not a suspected phishing page
  - This site does not appear to be a forgery or imitation of another website.
- Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 30 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 30 days.
- Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days.
- Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 90 days
  - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 90 days.

### Vulnerability Management

- Fail — End-of-life version of NGINX detected
  - The detected version of NGINX is end of life. The product will likely not receive security updates from the vendor moving forward.
- Fail — End-of-life version of PHP detected
  - The detected version of PHP is end of life. The product will likely not receive security updates from the vendor moving forward.
- Fail — NGINX 1.20.1 has potential vulnerabilities
  - NGINX 1.20.1 has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk.
- Fail — PHP 8.0.30 has potential vulnerabilities
  - PHP 8.0.30 has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk.

---
Full interactive report: https://www.upguard.com/security-report/capital-environment
Security Reports Policy: https://www.upguard.com/security-report-policy