# Forval Telecom Co., Ltd. Security Rating, Vendor Risk Report, and Data Breaches > This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/security-report/forval-telecom](https://www.upguard.com/security-report/forval-telecom), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Security scores and check results reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive report. ## Overview - Domain: forvaltel.co.jp - Grade: C (Fair) - Score: 553 / 950 - Last scan: August 28, 2026 - Website: https://www.forvaltel.co.jp - Employees: 302 - Location: Tokyo, Japan ## Vendor risk summary This vendor risk report is based on UpGuard's continuous monitoring of Forval Telecom Co., Ltd.'s security posture using open-source, commercial, and proprietary threat intelligence feeds. The results are summarized into a security rating based on the analysis of hundreds of individual checks across five risk categories: website security, email security, phishing & malware, brand & reputation risk, and network security. ## Security categories ### Website Security - Fail — Secure cookies not used - When secure cookies are not used, there is an increased risk of third parties intercepting information contained in these cookies. The website configuration should be changed so that all 'Set-Cookie' headers include 'secure'. - Fail — CSP is not implemented - No valid Content Security Policy is implemented. This increases the risk of XSS and clickjacking attacks. - Pass — Server information header not exposed - Ensuring the server information header is not exposed reduces the ability of attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. - Pass — X-Powered-By header not exposed - Information about specific technology used on the server is obscured. - Pass — X-Frame-Options is not deny or sameorigin - Browsers are prevented from displaying this website's content in frames. This helps mitigate clickjacking attacks. - Pass — HttpOnly cookies used - Using HttpOnly cookies reduces the risk of client side script attacks, by preventing cookies being read on the client. - Pass — Referrer policy is not unsafe-url - The website's Referrer Policy is not configured to allow unsafe information to be sent in the referrer header. - Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposing specific ASP.net version - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposing a specific version makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. - Pass — ASP.NET version header not exposed - Ensuring the ASP.NET version header is not exposed makes it harder for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. - Pass — X-Content-Type-Options is not nosniff - Browsers are prevented from interpreting files as a different MIME type to what is specified in the Content-Type HTTP header. This helps mitigate MIME confusion attacks. - Pass — No unmaintained page detected - The page appears to be maintained. ### Email - Fail — DMARC policy is p=none - DMARC policy is p=none. This provides no protection against fraudulent emails. The DMARC policy should be migrated to p=quarantine, and eventually p=reject. - Fail — SPF policy uses ~all - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record is too lenient as to which domains are allowed to send email on the domain's behalf. This record should preferably not use the ~all mechanism, as this does not instruct the mail receiver to reject messages from unauthorised sources. When DMARC is not being enforced, -all should be used on the SPF record. - Pass — DMARC policy exists - DMARC protects against fraudulent emails being sent from a domain. - Pass — SPF enabled - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records prevent spammers from sending messages with forged addresses. - Pass — SPF syntax correct - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record passes basic syntax checks. - Pass — SPF ptr mechanism not used - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record does not include the ptr mechanism. ### Network - Fail — 'FTP' port open - The 'FTP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'MySQL' port open - The 'MySQL' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'IMAP' port open - The 'IMAP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'POP3' port open - The 'POP3' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'SMTP' port open - The 'SMTP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'DNS' port open - The 'DNS' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'HTTP' port open - The 'HTTP' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. - Fail — 'HTTPS' port open - The 'HTTPS' service is running and exposed to the internet. The configuration of the server should be reviewed and unnecessary ports closed. ### DNS - Fail — DNSSEC not enabled - DNSSEC records prevent third parties from forging the records that guarantee a domain's identity. DNSSEC should be configured for this domain. - Pass — No unregistered MX records detected - No unregistered MX records that could lead to receiving mail on behalf of the target organization were detected. - Pass — No subdomain takeover vulnerability detected - No dangling DNS records that could lead to subdomain takeover were detected. ### Encryption - Fail — SSL not available - SSL is the standard encryption method for browsing websites. Enabling SSL requires installing an SSL certificate on the site. - Fail — SSL expired - SSL certificate has expired. The certificate will need to be renewed for connections to your domain to be trusted. - Fail — HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) not enforced - Without HSTS enforced, people browsing this site are more susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. The server should be configured to support HSTS. - Fail — SSL certificate chain missing from server response - There is an invalid or missing intermediate certificate. This can cause some browsers to break the padlock. An intermediate/chain certificate may need to be installed to link it to a trusted root certificate. - Fail — SSL expires in less than 20% of its total valid period - SSL certificate has less than 20% of its total valid period remaining. The certificate will need to be renewed to avoid expiry. - Pass — Certificate not found on our revoked certificate list - The site's certificate chain was checked against our list of revoked certificates. - Pass — Hostname matches SSL certificate - The site's hostname matches the SSL certificate. - Pass — Trusted SSL certificate - The certificate presented by this domain was issued by a trusted certificate authority. - Pass — SSL chain certificates do not expire within 20 days - SSL intermediate and root certificates do not expire within 20 days. - Pass — SSL expiration period shorter than 398 days - The SSL certificate presented by the server has an expiration period shorter than 398 days. - Pass — Strong SSL algorithm - Industry standard SHA-256 encryption in use. - Pass — Strong public certificate key length - The site's public certificate provides at least 112 bits of security strength. ### Data leakage - Pass — No open cloud storage service detected - No cloud storage service configured to allow anonymous file listing was detected. - Pass — Domain index is not a listable directory - The domain index is not a listable directory. ### IP/Domain Reputation - Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 30 days - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 90 days - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 90 days. ### Vulnerability Management - Fail — Mariadb 10.3.39 has potential vulnerabilities - Mariadb 10.3.39 has vulnerabilities which might be exploitable under certain conditions. Affected domains should be checked to determine which vulnerabilities might pose a risk. --- Full interactive report: https://www.upguard.com/security-report/forval-telecom Security Reports Policy: https://www.upguard.com/security-report-policy