# merry-suzhou Security Rating, Vendor Risk Report, and Data Breaches > This is a plain-markdown summary of [https://www.upguard.com/security-report/merry-suzhou](https://www.upguard.com/security-report/merry-suzhou), generated for AI agents and LLMs. Security scores and check results reflect UpGuard's independent analysis and are kept in sync with the source page. Visit the source URL for the full interactive report. Merry Suzhou operates in the manufacturing sector in China. The company produces industrial components and materials for domestic and international markets. Additional details about specific product lines are not publicly available. ## Overview - Domain: merry-suzhou.com.cn - Grade: B (Good) - Score: 719 / 950 - Last scan: September 2, 2026 - Industry: Manufacturing - Website: https://www.merry-suzhou.com.cn ## Vendor risk summary This vendor risk report is based on UpGuard's continuous monitoring of merry-suzhou's security posture using open-source, commercial, and proprietary threat intelligence feeds. The results are summarized into a security rating based on the analysis of hundreds of individual checks across five risk categories: website security, email security, phishing & malware, brand & reputation risk, and network security. ## Security categories ### Website Security - Fail — X-Frame-Options is not deny or sameorigin - Browsers may display this website's content in frames. This can lead to clickjacking attacks. - Fail — CSP is not implemented - No valid Content Security Policy is implemented. This increases the risk of XSS and clickjacking attacks. - Fail — Specific ASP.NET version exposed via header - Exposing a specific ASP.NET version in the ASP.NET version header makes it easier for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. The website configuration should be changed to remove this header completely. - Fail — Use of ASP.NET exposed via header - Exposing the ASP.NET version header indicates that the site is built with ASP.NET, which makes it easier for attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. The website configuration should be changed to remove this header. - Fail — X-Content-Type-Options is not nosniff - Browsers may interpret files as a different MIME type than what is specified in the Content-Type HTTP header. This can lead to MIME confusion attacks. - Fail — Unmaintained page detected - This domain appears to be unmaintained based on indicators like page content or status code. Unmaintained pages expand the attack surface for malicious actors. - Pass — Server information header not exposed - Ensuring the server information header is not exposed reduces the ability of attackers to exploit certain vulnerabilities. - Pass — X-Powered-By header not exposed - Information about specific technology used on the server is obscured. - Pass — Referrer policy is not unsafe-url - The website's Referrer Policy is not configured to allow unsafe information to be sent in the referrer header. ### Email - Fail — DMARC policy is p=none - DMARC policy is p=none. This provides no protection against fraudulent emails. The DMARC policy should be migrated to p=quarantine, and eventually p=reject. - Fail — SPF policy uses ~all - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record is too lenient as to which domains are allowed to send email on the domain's behalf. This record should preferably not use the ~all mechanism, as this does not instruct the mail receiver to reject messages from unauthorised sources. When DMARC is not being enforced, -all should be used on the SPF record. - Pass — DMARC policy exists - DMARC protects against fraudulent emails being sent from a domain. - Pass — SPF enabled - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records prevent spammers from sending messages with forged addresses. - Pass — SPF syntax correct - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record passes basic syntax checks. - Pass — SPF ptr mechanism not used - Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record does not include the ptr mechanism. ### Network - Pass — No ports are open - No open ports were detected. ### DNS - Fail — DNSSEC not enabled - DNSSEC records prevent third parties from forging the records that guarantee a domain's identity. DNSSEC should be configured for this domain. - Pass — No unregistered MX records detected - No unregistered MX records that could lead to receiving mail on behalf of the target organization were detected. - Pass — No subdomain takeover vulnerability detected - No dangling DNS records that could lead to subdomain takeover were detected. ### Encryption - Fail — SSL not available - SSL is the standard encryption method for browsing websites. Enabling SSL requires installing an SSL certificate on the site. - Fail — HTTP does not redirect to HTTPS - The domain is still accessible over HTTP. All HTTP requests should be redirected to HTTPS. - Fail — Hostname does not match SSL certificate - The site's hostname does not match the SSL certificate. The domain name should be added to the certificate, either as a Subject Alternative Name or as the Common Name. - Fail — HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) not enforced - Without HSTS enforced, people browsing this site are more susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks. The server should be configured to support HSTS. - Fail — SSL expiration period longer than 398 days - Certificates issued on or after September 1, 2020 must not have a validity period greater than 398 days. The certificate will need to be reissued with a maximum validity of 397 days. - Fail — Weak cipher suites supported in TLS 1.2 - Weak cipher suites can potentially be broken by a well resourced attacker, and should not be supported by the server unless very old devices or browsers must be supported. - Pass — Certificate not found on our revoked certificate list - The site's certificate chain was checked against our list of revoked certificates. - Pass — SSL has not expired - SSL certificate has not expired. - Pass — No insecure SSL/TLS versions available - No insecure SSL/TLS versions are available for this site. - Pass — SSL has more than 20% of its valid period remaining - SSL certificate does not expire in less than 20% of its total valid period. - Pass — Strong SSL algorithm - Industry standard SHA-256 encryption in use. - Pass — Strong public certificate key length - The site's public certificate provides at least 112 bits of security strength. ### Data leakage - Pass — No open cloud storage service detected - No cloud storage service configured to allow anonymous file listing was detected. - Pass — Domain index is not a listable directory - The domain index is not a listable directory. ### IP/Domain Reputation - Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 30 days - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 30 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 30 days. - Pass — No reports of botnet activity in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a source of botnet activity in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of brute force login attempts in the last 90 days - This IP/domain did not appear on any list of IPs and domains known to perform brute force login attempts in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of malware distribution in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has been reported for distributing malware in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported for performing unsolicited scanning in the last 90 days. - Pass — No reports of phishing activity in the last 90 days - This IP/domain has not been reported as a phishing site in the last 90 days. ### Vulnerability Management - Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2015-1635 (IIS HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution) - HTTP.sys in Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests. - Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2014-0160 (Heartbleed) - A bug in OpenSSL's implementation of the TLS heartbeat extension allows access to portions of memory on the targeted host e.g. cryptographic keys and passwords. - Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2014-3566 (POODLE) - The server does not support SSLv3, and is not vulnerable to the POODLE attack. - Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2015-0204 (FREAK) - The server does not offer RSA_EXPORT cipher suites, so clients are not vulnerable to the FREAK attack. - Pass — Not vulnerable to CVE-2015-4000 (Logjam) - The server is using strong Diffie-Hellman parameters and is not vulnerable to the Logjam attack. --- Full interactive report: https://www.upguard.com/security-report/merry-suzhou Security Reports Policy: https://www.upguard.com/security-report-policy