Recorded Future vs UpGuard

Compare the capabilities and features of Recorded Future and UpGuard. See which solution performs best across a range of categories.

Recorded Future vs UpGuard

See how they compare side-by-side.

Recorded Future vs UpGuard
Category UpGuard Recorded Future
General summary
UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.
Continuously monitors 150,000+ companies.
Key strengths
UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.
Key weaknesses
UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.
Usability and learning curve
Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.
Combines machine analytics with human expertise to produce intelligence for risk mitigation. Recorded Future’s platform categories, links, and analyses this intelligence in real-time to provide clear insights for users via its Security Intelligence Graph.
Cyber risk data accuracy
UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. Threat Monitoring scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.
The Recorded Future Intelligence Platform delivers real-time insights from open source, dark web, technical sources, and original research. Users can access these insights via the Security Intelligence Graph to proactively mitigate identified risks.
Vendor risk management features
UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. AI-powered security questionnaires read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.
Attack surface management features
UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.
Customer support
UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite responsive, hands-on support as a reason they continue with UpGuard.
The Recorded Future Podcast deep dives into cyber threat intelligence and provides industry insights. The Recorded Future Blog covers Intelligence analysis, industry perspectives, product updates, and company news.
Workflow automation
Risk Automations turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.
Artificial intelligence features
UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.
API and integrations
A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.
Offers RESTful APIs to allow integration to Recorded Future’s automated intelligence. Integrates with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM); Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR); endpoint security (EDR); incident response systems; vulnerability management tools, like AWS, Splunk, ServiceNow, Slack and more
Purchasing & licensing transparency
UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use Trust Exchange, UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.
Pricing not available on the website.
Customers
UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read UpGuard’s customer stories to learn more.
Major customers include Accenture, DuPont, Fujitsu, GAP, and McAfee.
G2 rating Accurate as of March 2025
More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
4.6, based on 127 reviews.
Security ratings

Recorded Future vs UpGuard product overview

Learn more about the products and how they compare.

Overview

This guide compares the functions and capabilities of Recorded Future and UpGuard to help you decide which Vendor Risk Management solution is best for your business.

Recorded Future Overview

Recorded Future is a US-based threat intelligence platform that collects digital threat intelligence data from the Internet including open source, dark web, technical sources, and original research.

Recorded Future’s platform uses machine learning and natural language process AI to deliver accessible intelligence insights across six risk categories: brand, threat, third-party, SecOps, vulnerability, and geopolitical.

Recorded Future UI

Recorded Future UI. Source: recordedfuture.com

UpGuard Overview

UpGuard is a third-party risk and attack surface management platform that helps global organizations prevent data breaches, monitor third-party vendors, and improve their security posture. UpGuard’s platform uses proprietary security ratings, data leak detection capabilities, and remediation workflows to proactively identify security exposures. UpGuard’s all-in-one third-party risk and attack surface management software intelligently groups risks into six categories: website risks, email security, network security, phishing & malware, reputation risk, and brand protection.

Usability and the learning curve

The usability, design, and learning curve of a product can play a large role in deciding which solution is right for you. The faster you and your team can get up to speed, the faster you can get your money’s worth.

Recorded Future and UpGuard offer their services via SaaS and are accessible from any location via a web browser.

  • Recorded Future: Interface is easy to read. Workflow is intuitive to new users but still requires time to master.
  • UpGuard: Very intuitive workflow allows new users to master the functions of the platform very quickly. User-friendly workflow also expedites the vendor onboarding process.

“UpGuard has improved the customer experience, reduced vendor onboarding times and introduced an industry-leading security posture, to elevate our customer well above all of its competitors.”

  • UpGuard customer.

Recorded Future vs. UpGuard: Risk Assessment Methodology

Recorded Future’s Intelligence Cards™ provide real-time insights on each entity available in the Intelligence Graph, including information like the risk score, further information on identified risks, in-house research, and more.

UpGuard provides a high-level summation of risk with the ability to drill down into precise technical details. Risks are prioritized based on in-house research, with the provision of further remediation and protection suggestions, where possible.

The platform also offers a risk assessment management feature with questionnaires based on popular regulations as well as a customizable questionnaire builder for bespoke security risk queries.

  • Recorded Future: Combines machine analytics with human expertise to produce intelligence for risk mitigation. Recorded Future’s platform categorizes, links, and analyses this intelligence in real-time to provide clear insights for users via its Security Intelligence Graph.
  • UpGuard: UpGuard’s integrated cyber risk platform combines security ratings, security assessment questionnaires, and threat intelligence capabilities to give businesses a comprehensive and continuously up-to-date view of their internal and third-party risk surface.

Recorded Future vs. UpGuard: Scope

Most organizations deal with a large inventory of vendors which makes vendor risk management an increasingly difficult feat. You need a wide coverage of third-party organizations to gain visibility over who has access to your sensitive data and to enact the right strategies to improve your security posture.

Recorded Future: Continuously monitors 150,000+ companies.

UpGuard: Continuously monitors 2,000,000+ organizations.

Capabilities

Recorded Future is a threat intelligence platform that uses machine learning and natural language processes AI intelligence to collect data from sources including open source, dark web, technical sources, and original research.

The platform’s Security Intelligence Graph provides brand, threat, third-party, SecOps, vulnerability, and geopolitical intelligence. It models relevant security information collected from billions of entities in real time. Their team of analysts also independently collects data to complement their AI findings.

UpGuard is a cybersecurity and Vendor Risk Management platform that helps global organizations prevent data breaches, detect data leaks monitor third-party vendors, and reduce third-party security risks.

UpGuard proactively identifies security exposures using proprietary security ratings, data leak detection capabilities, and remediation workflows. The platform processes over 800 billion data points each day to provide real-time insights..

  • Recorded Future: Continuously monitors 150,000+ companies.
  • UpGuard: Continuously monitors 2,000,000+ organizations.

Community support

Keeping customers and the cybersecurity community informed on the latest cyber security developments is paramount, with new vulnerabilities and threats emerging daily.

Both Recorded Future and UpGuard offer comprehensive online resources to educate and inform customers.

UpGuard’s blog content, however, is reviewed by industry experts to verify trustworthiness. UpGuard’s VRM blog content has also been regarded as more in-depth and helpful. In addition to its VRM blog, UpGuard regularly hosts a virtual summit to keep the global cybersecurity community updated with the latest VRM developments.

  • Recorded Future: The Recorded Future Podcast deep dives into cyber threat intelligence and provides industry insights. The Recorded Future Blog covers Intelligence analysis, industry perspectives, product updates, and company news.
  • UpGuard: UpGuard keeps the VRM community continuously updated with the latest industry developments through its blog content and quarterly summit event.

Release rate

UpGuard has adopted DevOps principles internally to develop, test, and release software on a continuous basis, ensuring fast, consistent, and safe releases that are thoroughly tested.

The release model for Recorded Future is unknown.

  • Recorded Future: The frequency of Recorded Future’s updates is not stated on the website.
  • UpGuard: UpGuard has adopted DevOps principles internally to develop, test, and release software continuously, ensuring fast, consistent, and safe releases. UpGuard has a regular fortnightly release rate, with all features, changes, and improvements listed under UpGuard Release Notes.

Pricing and support

Cyber risk platforms can be expensive and the common use of opaque pricing policies often takes power away from the purchaser. With most services offering tiered licensing options and add-ons, finding a solution that fits your needs and budget can prove more difficult without transparent pricing.

  • Recorded Future: Pricing for Recorded Future’s platform is not available on the website. Online product reviews suggest that it’s priced higher than some competitors.
  • UpGuard: UpGuard has a transparent pricing model which you can view here. UpGuard pricing starts at $5,249/year and scales with your company. If you have any questions, please email sales@upguard.com.

API and extensibility

Accessing the information in a cyber risk product outside of its graphical interface is important for integrated business strategies and consolidating data to a preferred system.

Both Recorded Future and UpGuard offer APIs.

  • Recorded Future: Offers RESTful APIs to allow integration to Recorded Future’s automated intelligence.
  • UpGuard: Offers a standard API to pull data from Upguard’s platform into other enterprise applications.

Third-party integrations

APIs are useful for technical staff, but not all information security teams have access to developers. In this situation, standard third-party integrations are an essential part of decision-making.

Both Recorded Future and UpGuard offer integrations into other platforms.

Customers

  • Recorded Future: Major customers include Accenture, DuPont, Fujitsu, GAP, and McAfee.
  • UpGuard: Customers include the New York Stock Exchange (ICE), Morningstar, Bill.com, IAG, PagerDuty, and Hopin

Here’s what a few UpGuard customers had to say about their experience. You can read more on Gartner reviews. “UpGuard has given us a view of our vendor security posture. The ability to launch a questionnaire or ask for a plan of remediation for items that show as vulnerable is also a great added value and a time saver. UpGuard is also very customer-focused. They respond quickly to issues and questions and welcome any input that could improve the product. Overall it is one of the best value add tools we have.""The simplicity of the product is fantastic. My team and I were able to be up and running in minutes. We monitor risks on over 25 vendors in near real-time and use these statistics to report to the C suite and Board of Directors. UpGuard has become part of the critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon.""The ease of use and simplicity of the product is excellent. We were able to be up and running with 50 vendors within minutes, not hours. The reporting is used for monthly statistics and is reported to our Senior Management. UpGuard has become an integral part of our critical cybersecurity metrics that we monitor and report upon.”

Security rating

Recorded Future’s risk-scoring methodology uses a combination of machine-learning techniques and in-house research. The platform takes into account potential risks, such as company mentions on the dark web, domain abuse, incident reports, leaded credentials, infrastructure abuse, and web application security to calculate risk scores.

The UpGuard platform generates security ratings through proprietary algorithms that take in and analyze trusted commercial and open-source data sets to non-intrusively collect data that can quantitatively evaluate cybersecurity risk. Ratings are based on the analysis of 70+ vectors, including email spoofing and phishing risk, vulnerabilities, malware susceptibility, network security, results of security questionnaires, exposure to known data breaches and data leaks, and more.

UpGuard’s security ratings range from 0-950, which is considerably wider than Recorded Future’s rating system, which only ranges from 0-100. UpGuard’s larger range could be more helpful when assessing greater risk details.

  • Recorded Future: Provides a score between 0-100 along with a level of criticality, labeled as Informational (5-24), Moderate (25-64), or High (65-99).
  • UpGuard: Provides a cyber risk score between 0 and 950 along with the following letter grades, A: 801-950, B: 601-800, C: 401-600, D: 201-400, F: 0-200. You can request your free security rating by clicking here.

Let’s take a look at how Recorded Future and UpGuard compare when assessed with the security rating solution on UpGuard’s platform on July 28, 2020. It’s important to note that UpGuard adheres to the Principles of Fair and Accurate Security Ratings, removing all biases in this analysis.

  • Accuracy and Validation: UpGuard’s security ratings are empirical, data-driven, and based on independently verifiable and accessible information.
  • Model Governance: The datasets and methodologies used to calculate our security ratings can change in line with our improving understanding of cybersecurity risk mitigation. When this happens, we provide reasonable notice and explanation to our customers about the impact on their security rating.
  • Independence: No commercial agreement or lack thereof allows an organization to improve its security rating outside of the unbiased measurements of UpGuard’s security ratings.
  • Confidentiality: Any information disclosed to UpGuard during a challenged rating or dispute is appropriately protected. Nor do we provide third parties.

Experience superior visibility and a simpler approach to cyber risk management