Operations security (OPSEC) is a process that identifies friendly actions that could be useful for a potential attacker if properly analyzed and grouped with other data to reveal critical information or sensitive data. OPSEC uses countermeasures to reduce or eliminate adversary exploitation.
OPSEC is both an analytical process and a strategy used in risk management to identify information that can be exploited by an attacker and used to collect critical information that could damage an organization's plans or reputation.
The term operations security was coined by the United States military during the Vietnam War, as a result of military operations led by a team dubbed Purple Dragon.
Purple Dragon noticed America's adversaries were able to anticipate their strategies and tactics despite North Vietnam and the Viet Cong's inability to decrypt U.S. communications and no real intelligence collection assets on the inside.
The conclusion was that the U.S. was inadvertently revealing unclassified information to the enemy that was being grouped together and exploited.
Today, this concept has spread from the military to other parts of the U.S. government and Department of Defense (DoD) to protect national security, as well as trade secrets and customer data in private industry.
OPSEC is particularly popular among cybersecurity risk management, data protection, corporate espionage and information security professionals.
OPSEC is concerned with protecting individual pieces of data that can be aggregated to form a bigger picture.
The OPSEC process results in the development of technical and non-technical measures to reduce cybersecurity risk, first-party risk, third-party risk and fourth-party risk.
While OPSEC is generally concerned with protecting against non-sensitive data being aggregated together, it often still uses technical countermeasures that are used to protect sensitive data.
Common technical countermeasures include protecting against different types of malware like the WannaCry ransomware, vulnerabilities, email spoofing, phishing, domain hijacking and other cyber attacks that lead to data breaches and data leaks.
Non-technical countermeasures include paying attention to pictures you have taken (such as items in the background) and not talking openly on social media about your organization's sensitive information.
Implementing an effective operational security program prevents the inadvertent exposure of sensitive or classified information concerning your organization's activities, intentions or capabilities.
The reality is every organization has things they need or want to hide from the general public. The key is identifying what this information is, how well it is protected, what the impact will be when compromised and how your organization will respond.
Armed with publicly accessible information, motivated attackers can do serious damage especially if your organization or its employees are reusing login credentials across services.
Without OPSEC your organization may be suffering from death by a thousand cuts. It's not that one piece of information causes damage, it's the accumulated data over time that allows attackers to gather enough information in order to launch a cyber attack.
Being aware of what information is being shared by management, vendors and employees is vitally important.
An OPSEC plan is a five step risk assessment process that assists an organization in identifying what information requires protection and what security measures should be employed to protect them.
The best way to understand what OPSEC involves is to walk through an example of what people are able to piece together with public information.
In March 2017, Ashley Feinberg from Gizmodo was able to track down FBI Director James Comey's Instagram and Twitter account using publicly available information gathered on social media.
Feinberg was able to find Comey's Twitter account by searching Twitter for his son Brien, who is a college basketball player at Kenyon college.
A tweet about Brien featured a now-dead Twitter account called "@twittafuzz". Feinberg then searched Instagram for the same handle and requested to follow Brien. Once she tapped the follow button, she was algorithmically suggested an account called "reinholdniebuhr" named after a theologian that James Comey wrote his senior thesis about.
The account also happened to have 9 followers which was the exact number Comey's instagram account was rumoured to have:
Fun fact: #FBI director James #Comey is on twitter & apparently on Instagram with nine followers. pic.twitter.com/lDIFirzVeh
— Kevin Rincon (@KevRincon) March 30, 2017
Feinberg then searched Twitter for "reinhold niebuhr" and found one handle "@projectexile7" which seemed to be named after a gun violence reduction program Comey help start in the '90s. @projectexile7 has one follower, legal blogger Benjamin Wittes, who happened to be a personal friend of Comey.
By October 2017, it was confirmed that Feinberg was correct.
This is an example of how even the most security-conscious individuals can expose themselves with publicly available information.
And while this example is relatively benign, it's not hard to see how damaging this information gathering process could be for government agencies and other organizations.
Keep in mind, OPSEC must extend beyond your organization's walls to your third and fourth-party vendors. It needs to be part of your third-party risk management framework and vendor risk management programs.