A side-by-side comparison of Push with its main competitors. Easily compare performance across multiple categories and understand what the market is saying with independent reviews.
A side-by-side comparison of Push with its main competitors. Easily compare performance across multiple categories and understand what the market is saying with independent reviews.
UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.
Push Security is a browser-based identity and SaaS security platform delivered as a lightweight extension that works across all major browsers (including AI and enterprise browsers) without replacing the browser or deploying endpoint agents. By combining in-browser telemetry, real-time controls, and autonomous detection agents, Push targets four outcomes: detecting and stopping browser-based attacks; giving visibility and control over employee AI usage; hardening identities and shadow SaaS by surfacing ghost logins, weak or breached credentials, and accounts that bypass SSO/MFA; and preventing data loss across apps and AI tools. It captures attacks and risky activity that network and IdP-based tools miss. Its main limitation is inherent to the model: coverage is limited to in-browser activity on devices where the extension is installed, so threats or apps outside the browser are out of its visibility.
Torii is primarily a SaaS management and governance platform designed to curb software and AI sprawl. By continuously tracking applications, desktop software, and shadow AI, it maps assets to human and machine identities, enabling teams to optimize spend, manage renewals, and automate offboarding workflows. While it includes identity governance (IGA) and an AI dashboard for tracking tokens and keys, its core focus remains operational. Torii is built for cost control and access management rather than deep security, meaning it provides no true threat detection, SSPM, or attack surface management.
Unixi is a Universal SSO platform that extends single sign-on and MFA to any browser-based application—including non-SAML and shadow SaaS—without custom integrations or the traditional SSO tax. Using a patented passwordless technology called Key Derived Authentication (KDA), it provides one-button login while eliminating passwords, closing common credential-theft paths for these apps. Beyond SSO, Unixi uncovers unmanaged apps, shared accounts, and weak credentials, enabling enforcement of baseline access governance. Its main limitation is scope: it functions strictly as an identity and access tool, offering no live threat detection, SSPM, vendor risk management, or external attack surface management.
Zluri is a next-generation security platform built to manage both human and machine identities across the enterprise. Its core engine, an intelligence layer called IRIS, normalizes data from SaaS, cloud, and on-premises systems into a relationship graph that maps real-world permissions and access paths. Built on this foundation, Zluri delivers three core capabilities: visibility and intelligence (IVIP), governance and administration (IGA), and security posture management (ISPM)—using a universal connector to cover apps lacking native APIs. Additionally, it features SaaS management capabilities for cost control and shadow IT discovery. The platform, however, focuses strictly on compliance and posture rather than active runtime defense, so it does not offer ITDR, external attack surface management, or security ratings.
Key strengths
UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.
By operating directly in the browser, Push intercepts evasive identity attacks—such as AiTM phishing, session token theft, and ClickFix—that traditional IdP and endpoint tools miss. Its autonomous agents leverage behavioral signals to actively block threats in real time rather than just triggering alerts. Delivered as a lightweight extension with no endpoint agents, it deploys rapidly across major browsers to protect corporate, BYOD, and Chromebook endpoints alike. The platform uncovers hidden shadow SaaS and ghost logins, using in-browser guardrails to nudge users toward MFA at login, all backed by the company's well-regarded browser-attack threat research.
Torii's strength is application discovery: it positions itself as a top app-discovery platform, continuously finding SaaS, AI, and even desktop applications, including shadow IT, through a broad set of methods and a deep integration catalog spanning HRMS, finance, contract management, and identity providers. It pairs this with strong cost optimization and license management capabilities, helping teams reclaim unused licenses (with ~25% cost savings) and stay ahead of renewals. Torii is also known for a powerful no-code workflow automation engine that orchestrates app-lifecycle tasks, particularly automated employee onboarding and offboarding/deprovisioning, across connected systems. Backing this is enterprise-grade maturity (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO-only access).
Unixi extends SSO and MFA to any browser-based application, including non-SAML and shadow SaaS, without custom integrations, working alongside an organization's existing IdP to eliminate the vendor SSO tax and provide an immediate cost advantage. Its patented Key Derived Authentication delivers passwordless, phishing-resistant logins by utilizing multi-key, multi-location authentication material that is never stored, effectively neutralizing credential theft and AiTM attacks at the source. Beyond authentication, Unixi discovers unmanaged apps, shared accounts, and weak passwords, while providing access governance controls such as role-based permissions, approved-app enforcement, and audit-ready compliance tracking.
Zluri's primary strength lies in its comprehensive visibility across both human and machine identities, including service accounts and AI agents. Powered by its IRIS intelligence engine and a universal app connector, the platform maps real-world permissions and access paths across SaaS, cloud, and local systems into a single relationship graph. This rich telemetry feeds into its advanced lifecycle automation—seamlessly handling access reviews, joiner/mover/leaver workflows, and segregation-of-duties policies to satisfy major compliance frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA. Additionally, its posture management features proactively flag risks such as over-privileged or dormant accounts, while retaining tools to optimize software spend and uncover shadow IT.
Key weaknesses
UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.
Push has some maturing feature gaps worth noting. The most substantive issue is alert quality: a reviewer notes that individual alerts can lack context, making it harder to triage critical threats amid the volume of notifications. Reviewers also cite specific gaps, such as no manual way to add apps (for services not accessed via Google or Microsoft SSO), no data export for the app inventory (noted as on the roadmap), and no built-in extension/deployment-health monitoring to confirm coverage.
A few product limitations stand out for buyers. Reviewers cite gaps in integration coverage: while Torii's catalog is broad, certain tools lack direct integrations, which can limit functionality. The workflow engine, though powerful, has editing limitations: the absence of branching/merging logic and of import/export for workflows, and complex scenarios such as detailed user provisioning or license reconciliation sometimes require manual adjustment. Reporting depth is another recurring request, with some wanting richer insights and a more complete view of usage and access changes across all apps.
Because Unixi operates as a browser-based Universal SSO via an extension, its protection is naturally confined to browser-accessible apps—leaving desktop applications or users without the extension out of scope. The platform's functional footprint is also intentionally narrow, focusing purely on identity and access governance rather than full-scale SaaS security or management. Additionally, as an emerging vendor, Unixi offers limited independent third-party validation to prove its reliability at scale. Buyers should also note that its passwordless framework depends on a proprietary, patented authentication method (KDA) that requires careful evaluation against existing enterprise identity architectures.
Reviews cite integration and data setup as limitations for Zluri: some application integrations require additional configuration or validation before usage data is fully accurate, adding onboarding time. Contract and spend-related data depend on the quality and completeness of the uploaded source documents, which requires upfront manual effort. Then there is complexity: Zluri is feature-rich, and the sheer number of features and views can feel overwhelming at first. These are largely onboarding and usability-oriented issues rather than fundamental gaps, and they come from a large, mostly positive review base.
Usability and learning curve
Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.
Push deploys as a lightweight browser extension that installs in minutes, often via existing MDM, with no endpoint agents and minimal ongoing maintenance. Because controls and prompts live in the browser, end users receive just-in-time, non-intrusive nudges (and optional Slack/ChatOps messages) rather than friction, which lowers the change-management burden. The administrator's learning curve is modest. The main usability caveat is the console experience, as alerts can lack context, making triage noisier until tuned.
Torii is generally regarded as intuitive and easy to use, with a clean interface and strong day-to-day usability scores. Initial onboarding centers on connecting integrations to build a complete app and identity inventory. The no-code automation builder is approachable for common tasks like onboarding and offboarding, though building more complex, branching workflows carries a steeper learning curve. Overall, the learning curve is moderate and well-supported, with the main effort being the upfront work of integrating the SaaS estate.
Unixi minimizes friction for both users and administrators. For end users, it provides a seamless, one-button passwordless login that reduces password resets and login fatigue. For IT teams, onboarding is significantly lighter than with legacy SSO. Because Unixi layers onto your existing IdP without requiring custom SAML configurations, administrators can pull unmanaged shadow apps under centralized control via a managed browser extension. Free trials and assessments make it easy to pilot, though its ultimate value depends entirely on the successful deployment of extensions across every user's browser. Furthermore, as an emerging vendor, Unixi's long-term usability at massive enterprise scale lacks extensive independent validation.
Zluri is generally well-regarded for its usability. Onboarding centers on connecting integrations to build the identity and application inventory. Because the platform is broad, spanning visibility, IGA, posture, and SaaS management, reviewers note that the number of features and views can feel overwhelming at first, especially for non-technical users, creating a moderate learning curve to know where to focus. A large, positive review base suggests teams get up to speed effectively, but the main effort is the upfront integration and configuration work.
Cyber risk data accuracy
UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. Threat Monitoring scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.
By instrumenting the browser session directly, Push captures high-fidelity, first-party data: actual login methods, credential reuse and breaches, session tokens, OAuth grants, and real app usage per user that network, IdP, and endpoint-based tools can't see. Detections rely on behavioral signals that attackers struggle to rotate (for example, AiTM-proxy and session-hijacking indicators), supporting accurate, real-time identification of identity attacks rather than after-the-fact log analysis. The main caveats are scope and maturity: telemetry is limited to in-browser activity on devices running the extension, so non-browser or native-app activity isn't captured, and as a newer platform, some detection content and alert context are still being refined.
Torii excels at discovery by combining signals from direct integrations, a browser extension, SSO, finance systems, and email to uncover shadow IT and map it to human and machine identities and entitlements. While automated ingestion keeps these logs current, data depth drops significantly for applications lacking direct API connections. Furthermore, the data itself remains structurally tailored for IT operational management, tracking spend and ownership rather than security telemetry.
Unixi's data is identity and login-centric. Because it sits in the authentication path via the browser, it has first-hand visibility into how users actually log in, surfacing unmanaged and non-SAML apps, shadow SaaS, shared accounts, weak or reused passwords, and places where SSO is bypassed, providing high-fidelity access and identity discovery within its scope. That said, the data is focused on identity and access rather than broader security telemetry (it is not threat-detection or posture data), its visibility is limited to browser-based logins where the extension is deployed, and, with little independent review data available, the accuracy and completeness of discovery are not yet externally validated at scale.
Zluri excels at asset discovery by aggregating signals from direct APIs, identity providers, finance systems, and a browser agent. Its IRIS intelligence layer normalizes these multi-source inputs to map out exact permission paths for both human and machine identities across SaaS, cloud, and custom environments. While this provides high-fidelity visibility into active entitlements, reviewers note that data reliability varies with integration coverage, requiring manual validation for less-supported apps. Additionally, spend insights depend strictly on the completeness of uploaded contract documents, and the underlying data engine is structurally optimized for identity governance rather than live security threat telemetry.
Vendor risk management features
UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. AI-powered security questionnaires read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.
Dedicated third-party/vendor risk management is not a function of Push, and it lacks common TPRM lifecycle workflows. Its only third-party-risk overlap is at the integration layer: because it sees OAuth grants and app-to-app connections in the browser, Push can surface and flag risky or malicious third-party integrations that have been granted access to corporate data. This reduces one slice of third-party exposure, but organizations needing vendor due diligence and risk assessments would require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.
Dedicated third-party/vendor risk management is not a core function of Torii, and it lacks TPRM lifecycle workflows such as security questionnaires, formal vendor security assessments and scoring, and continuous vendor posture monitoring. Its vendor-related capabilities are operational rather than security-focused: it manages SaaS vendor contracts, renewals, spend, and ownership, and can assign basic risk scores and owners to discovered apps to flag shadow IT. This helps teams keep an inventory of which vendors are in use and govern access to them, but organizations needing vendor security due diligence and risk assessments would require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.
Vendor (third-party) risk management is outside Unixi's scope. It is an identity and access tool, not a TPRM platform, and offers none of the core VRM workflows. The only tangential overlap is that, by discovering the unmanaged and shadow SaaS apps employees use, Unixi gives visibility into which third-party services are present in the environment, but that is access discovery and governance, not vendor risk assessment. Organizations that need vendor due diligence require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.
Zluri is not a dedicated third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) platform, and lacks the security-oriented VRM lifecycle of a dedicated solution. Its vendor-related capabilities are operational and governance-focused: it manages SaaS vendor contracts, renewals, and spend, tracks which third-party (and AI) apps are in use, and governs access to them, including surfacing risky or over-permissioned third-party integrations. This provides useful visibility into third-party apps in an environment and helps control access, but organizations that need vendor security due diligence and assessments would require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.
Attack surface management features
UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.
Push maps the identity attack surface from within the browser, uncovering critical gaps that IdPs miss, including shadow SaaS, ghost logins, bypassed MFA, weak credentials, and risky OAuth grants. Unlike management-only platforms, it actively shrinks this exposure using real-time, in-browser guardrails. However, because this approach is strictly identity and browser-centric, Push does not monitor the external, internet-facing attack surface (such as domains, IPs, or certificates). Organizations requiring conventional ASM will still need a dedicated solution.
Torii does not perform external attack surface management and is not a security-focused attack-surface tool. What it provides is visibility into the SaaS and identity attack surface from a management lens: a continuous inventory of every app (including shadow SaaS and AI), the human and machine identities that can access them, and their entitlements and ownership. This inventory helps teams understand and shrink unmanaged apps and access sprawl, but it stops short of security-oriented attack-surface analysis and offers no internet-facing ASM. Teams needing security attack-surface management would pair Torii with a dedicated tool.
Unixi shrinks an organization's identity exposure by discovering shadow SaaS, shared accounts, weak passwords, and SSO bypasses. It then closes these security gaps by bringing unmanaged apps under MFA, eliminating passwords for those apps, and enforcing strict approved-app policies. While this directly neutralizes the credential risks behind most breaches, it remains a purely identity-centric defense. Unixi does not scan external, internet-facing assets such as domains, IPs, or certificates, so teams that require conventional attack surface management (ASM) will still need a dedicated tool.
Zluri's Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM) notably minimizes enterprise exposure by mapping access paths across all human and machine accounts. The platform actively surfaces internal risks—such as over-privileged users, toxic access combinations, dormant accounts, and unmonitored shadow apps—before guiding teams through prioritized remediation and access reviews. However, this defense is strictly identity-centric. Zluri does not scan external, internet-facing infrastructure such as domains, IPs, or certificates, so organizations that require traditional attack surface management (ASM) will still need a dedicated tool.
Customer support
UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite responsive, hands-on support as a reason they continue with UpGuard.
Customers describe the Push team as responsive, quick to resolve issues, and unusually engaged, actively listening to feature requests and iterating quickly, reflecting the company's product-led, high-touch approach as a fast-growing vendor. Self-service resources include a public help center/documentation and a status page, and the product's in-browser prompts and Slack/ChatOps integration reduce support load by guiding end users directly. The main caveats are that Push does not publicly document formal support tiers or SLAs, and the strongly positive sentiment comes from a relatively small public review base.
Customers are paired with a dedicated Customer Success Manager and supported by a customer-experience team that emphasizes onboarding, education, and ongoing partnership, backed by a dedicated onboarding portal and a regularly updated help center. Torii reports strong, quantified metrics: roughly 90% of requests are answered in under two hours, and about 80% are resolved on first contact. A regular webinar series and customer education round out the experience, and support is cited as one of Torii's best attributes.
There is limited public information on Unixi's support model, and because the product has little independent review presence, no third-party data to gauge responsiveness. As a smaller, emerging vendor, Unixi engages prospects and customers through demos, a free assessment, and direct contact, typically delivering hands-on, high-touch support at this stage of a company's growth. However, Unixi does not publicly document formal support tiers, SLAs, or a self-service help center or knowledge base, so buyers should confirm support scope and response commitments during evaluation.
Customer support is frequently praised across Zluri's large G2 review base, with customers highlighting responsive support and hands-on customer success and onboarding assistance. Self-service resources are well developed: Help Docs, a support portal, Zluri Academy for training and enablement, and a Trust Center. New customers are typically guided through onboarding and integration setup by Zluri's team, which helps offset the platform's breadth and upfront configuration effort. The main caveat is that Zluri does not publicly document formal support tiers or SLAs, so specifics are set during contracting.
Workflow automation
Risk Automations turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.
Push's autonomous agents continuously analyze browser telemetry and automatically write detections and deploy blocks in real time, stopping phishing pages, AiTM proxies, and malicious OAuth flows at machine speed without waiting on an analyst. Remediation and policy enforcement also happen in-browser: Push can block risky actions, enforce AI-usage policy, restrict logins, and present automated guardrails that prompt users to enable MFA, adopt SSO, or change weak passwords at the moment of risk. Automated Slack/ChatOps notifications loop in both employees and the security team, and telemetry can be forwarded to SIEM/SOAR for downstream response workflows.
Torii's no-code automation engine lets teams build custom workflows that orchestrate the full app lifecycle: automating user onboarding (provisioning access to the right apps), access requests and approvals, license reclamation and budget enforcement, renewal management, and especially employee offboarding, where it deprovisions access across connected apps the moment someone leaves. Actions execute across integrated systems, with audit evidence streamed to SIEM and APIs/IaC available to automate at scale. The limitation is the workflow editor itself as it lacks branching/merging logic and import/export, so the most complex provisioning or reconciliation scenarios can still require manual adjustment.
Unixi focuses its automation strictly on access governance and identity offboarding rather than broad workflow orchestration. Administrators can leverage role-based permissions and an approved-app policy to enforce compliance, while its login restriction feature automatically blocks unsanctioned shadow IT by forcing all traffic through its universal SSO. For offboarding, Unixi streamlines user lifecycle management by centrally revoking access to both managed and unmanaged apps when an employee leaves. However, because Unixi lacks a general-purpose or no-code workflow engine, it cannot replace the comprehensive application lifecycle automation found in dedicated SaaS management platforms.
Zluri leverages a no-code engine to automate the entire identity lifecycle—handling onboarding provisioning, role changes, and access revocation seamlessly. Beyond core lifecycle management, it supports self-service requests and compliance audits with features such as automated reviews, one-click remediation, and segregation-of-duties enforcement. It also extends into posture management by automatically flagging and resolving dormant or over-privileged access. While the absolute reach of these automated workflows is ultimately bound to your target systems, Zluri's universal connector allows teams to easily extend this governance to custom or legacy apps that lack native APIs.
Artificial intelligence features
UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.
Push's approach integrates AI in two main ways. First, Push uses AI defensively: autonomous agents analyze high-fidelity browser telemetry to detect and block AI-enabled attacks in real time, writing detections and deploying blocks at machine speed rather than relying on analysts. Second, it secures employees' AI usage: Push sees which AI tools and agents are in use, what data is being pasted or shared into them, and what permissions are granted, and enforces AI-usage policy in the browser across both human and agentic sessions. The result is meaningful AI capability on both the detection and AI-governance sides, though it does not market a separate branded generative-AI analyst copilot.
Torii markets an always-on agentic AI that continuously monitors the SaaS estate, surfaces real-time alerts, and proposes fixes while keeping changes human-approved, positioning itself as a SaaS governance copilot. AI also supports its core discovery and prioritization, helping classify discovered apps and rank recommended actions based on a team's goals. Separately, its AI Dashboard governs the organization's AI usage, forecasts AI spend, and monitors API keys, tokens, and agents. These capabilities are useful and expanding, but Torii's AI is oriented toward SaaS governance, discovery, and automation rather than security detection or a deeply branded analyst copilot.
While Unixi lacks native AI or machine learning capabilities, it actively delivers shadow AI governance to ensure that employee interactions with the technology are secure. The platform's core framework relies on a patented cryptographic authentication method (Key-Derived Authentication) rather than on AI copilots or automated detection models. However, by maintaining deep visibility into the login path, it successfully uncovers hidden AI tools, identifies personal AI accounts, and blocks high-risk integrations. Ultimately, Unixi governs enterprise AI use, even though the underlying defense engine is not AI-powered.
AI and machine learning underpin Zluri's IRIS identity intelligence layer, which analyzes identity and access signals to detect access anomalies and risk, prioritize issues by impact, and recommend clear remediation actions. AI also powers discovery and classification by automatically identifying and categorizing SaaS and AI apps, including shadow IT, and supports access reviews with recommendations that speed approve/revoke decisions. Zluri also monitors AI apps and helps govern non-human and AI agent identities. These are meaningful, embedded intelligence capabilities oriented toward identity governance and risk, though Zluri positions them as an intelligence and decisioning layer rather than a broad, branded generative AI copilot.
API and integrations
A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.
Push is built to slot into an existing security stack rather than replace it. It deploys via standard browser-extension management (including MDM) and integrates with identity providers (Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google) to enrich and complement IdP data, with the browser layer adding what the IdP can't see. For operations, Push forwards its detections and telemetry to SIEM and SOAR tools, sends real-time notifications via Slack/ChatOps, and offers an API (and webhooks) to push data into the rest of the stack. The integration set is well-suited to security operations, though, as a focused browser-security tool, its catalog is narrower and more security-stack-oriented than that of a broad SaaS-management platform.
Integrations are central to Torii as it offers a broad catalog of deep, direct integrations spanning identity providers (Okta, Google, Entra), HRMS, finance and expense systems, contract management, and core SaaS apps (Salesforce, Slack, Jira, Workato, and Vanta). Discovery also draws on a browser extension, SSO, and email signals, and Torii provides an open API and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) support, enabling teams to automate governance and move data at scale. For apps without a native connector, custom integrations and the API help fill gaps. The main caveat is that coverage is not exhaustive, and some tools still lack direct integrations, which can require custom work.
Unixi inverts the traditional identity model by extending SSO and automated lifecycle provisioning to any browser-based application without requiring individual, app-by-app configurations. Built to complement rather than replace your legacy architecture, it layers seamlessly onto existing identity providers like Okta, Ping, and Microsoft Entra. The primary trade-off is the platform's closed ecosystem: Unixi lacks a broad third-party marketplace, and public documentation for open APIs or SIEM/SOAR tools is limited. Teams reliant on extensive downstream tooling or programmatic access will want to verify these capabilities directly.
Zluri features one of the largest integration catalogs in its category, providing hundreds of deep, bi-directional connectors across identity providers (Okta, Entra, Google), HRMS, finance, and core SaaS apps to power both asset discovery and automated provisioning. To eliminate the blind spots of connector-only platforms, its Universal Identity Connector (part of IRIS) seamlessly extends this governance to custom, cloud, and on-premises applications. While an open API supports broader custom data exchange, user reviews note a key caveat: integration depth varies by app, and certain platforms require extra configuration or validation before returning fully reliable data.
Purchasing & licensing transparency
UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use Trust Exchange, UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.
Push is highly transparent about pricing. Its Standard plan (up to 500 employees) is published at $5 per employee per month on an annual 12-month contract, or $6 per employee per month billed monthly, with both monthly and annual options. The first 10 licenses are free, giving teams a no-cost entry point, and organizations with 500+ employees move to an Enterprise plan with volume discounts. Licensing is straightforward and self-managed: admins add or remove employee licenses as headcount changes, and Push accepts card payments (Stripe) or bank transfers, with invoices visible in-app. Only the large-enterprise tier is custom-quoted.
Torii does not have public pricing. Plans are quote-based and tailored by company size; its site frames offerings around Scale-up and Enterprise segments, and prospective buyers obtain pricing through a personalized demo. There is no publicly advertised free plan or self-service free trial; evaluation runs through sales-led demos and proofs of concept. Third-party review data points to negotiated annual enterprise contracts, reinforcing that cost depends on a sales conversation rather than published rates.
Unixi does not publish public pricing. There is no pricing page, tier breakdown, or per-user rate on its site. Buyers obtain pricing through a demo or by contacting the vendor, and licensing terms are not publicly documented. On the positive side, Unixi lowers the barrier to evaluation by offering a free trial and a free assessment, so teams can try it without an upfront commitment. Overall, packaging and cost are opaque and require a sales conversation, though the free trial and assessment offset this somewhat.
Zluri does not publish public pricing. Pricing is quote-based and obtained through a sales demo, typically scaled by organization size and the products/modules selected; third-party marketplaces have estimated roughly $4–8 per user per month and a tiered structure (e.g., Standard/Professional/Enterprise), but Zluri does not confirm these publicly. Zluri's website offers an ROI calculator to estimate value, and evaluation is sales-led (demo/proof of concept) rather than a self-service free trial. Ultimately, cost and packaging are opaque and require a sales conversation.
Customers
UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read UpGuard’s customer stories to learn more.
Push publicly cites well-known technology and security-savvy customers, several of whom provide named testimonials. Examples include GitLab, Ramp, Cribl, GreyNoise, and PortSwigger (others cited include Upvest and Thinkst), with endorsements from security leaders at Flex, Inductive Automation, and Cribl. The customer base skews toward technology companies and security-mature organizations, notably several security vendors themselves, which lends credibility, though the publicly named roster is still modest in size.
Torii publicly cites a roster of mid-market and enterprise customers. Examples include Instacart, Palo Alto Networks, Bumble, Carrier, and Pipedrive (others cited include Payoneer, SimilarWeb, and monday), and published case studies feature Rock Content (which saved over $1M), AppsFlyer (managing 300+ apps), and HiBob (cutting roughly 25% of SaaS spend). The customer base skews toward technology and internet companies, as well as mid-to-large enterprises managing sprawling SaaS estates.
Unixi publicly displays a Trusted by list of customers and features testimonials from security leaders. Named logos include Intuit, Paramount, Cymulate, WELL Health, LifeLabs, and Hippo (others shown include NAF, knix, Luno, and boAt). The roster spans technology, media, insurance, healthcare, and financial services, and includes some recognizable enterprise names. However, as an emerging vendor, the publicly named customer base is still relatively small and not independently corroborated.
Zluri publishes an extensive set of named customer case studies across mid-market and enterprise organizations, many with quantified outcomes. Examples include BambooHR, Nuvei, Narvar, Guesty, and Underdog (others featured include Kasada, Tripledot Studios, Pano AI, Radicle Health, and Anzu), with results such as large IT-hour savings, faster provisioning, and reduced audit time. The customer base skews toward technology, fintech, and mid-to-large enterprises managing significant SaaS and identity sprawl. The roster is broad and well-documented, though it leans toward recognizable tech and mid-market names rather than marquee Fortune 100 brands.
G2 rating Accurate as of March 2025
More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
Push is transparent and simple: it charges a single per-employee license for the whole platform. The Standard plan (up to 500 employees) is $5 per employee per month on an annual contract, or $6 per employee per month billed monthly. Organizations with more than 500 employees move to an Enterprise plan with volume-based discounts (contact sales). The first 10 licenses are free, and licenses are self-managed. Admins add or remove employees as headcount changes, and usage is billed via card (Stripe) or bank transfer.
Here’s an overview of Push’s plans and services:
Free plan
Effectively yes: the first 10 employee licenses are free, giving small teams or pilots a no-cost way to use the platform. There is no separate free “community” edition beyond this.
Free trial
Push does not advertise a separate time-limited free trial; the first-10-licenses-free tier serves as the no-cost entry point, and prospective buyers can also book a demo.
Standard (up to 500 employees)
The Standard plan covers organizations with up to 500 employees at $5 per employee/month (annual) or $6 per employee per month (monthly), and includes the full platform: browser-based attack detection and response, AI visibility and control, identity and shadow-SaaS hardening, and data-loss prevention. Billing flexes monthly or annually.
Enterprise (500+ employees)
For organizations with over 500 employees, Push offers an Enterprise plan with custom, volume-based pricing and monthly or annual billing. Pricing is arranged with sales.
Add-ons and additional costs
Billing frequency: Monthly billing is priced higher ($6 per employee/month) than annual ($5), so monthly flexibility carries a premium.
Volume discounts: Organizations above 500 employees qualify for negotiated volume pricing under the Enterprise plan.
All-inclusive licensing: Push’s capabilities are bundled into the per-employee license rather than sold as separate paid modules, so there are few traditional add-ons.
How does Push’s pricing compare to its competitors?
UpGuard
UpGuard’s pricing starts at USD 1,599 per month. The platform maximizes value by offering out-of-the-box workflows supporting the entire TPRM lifecycle—saving users from having to purchase additional tools to fill TPRM workflow gaps.
It offers a free plan that lets you monitor up to five vendors, with access to assessment and remediation workflows. UpGuard’s Trust Exchange tool, which streamlines vendor questionnaires and trust management, is also free.
Torii does not publish public pricing; plans are quote-based and tailored by company size (it frames offerings around “Scale-up” and “Enterprise” segments) and obtained through a personalized demo, with no advertised free plan or self-service trial. Compared with Push’s published per-employee pricing, Torii is far less transparent.
Unixi also does not publish public pricing; plans are quote-based and arranged through a demo, though it offers a free trial and free assessment to start. As a Universal SSO tool, its cost narrative centers on eliminating the “SSO tax” that other vendors charge for SAML support and integrations.
Zluri does not publish public pricing (its pricing page has been removed). It uses an employee-count-based model across Standard, Professional, and Enterprise tiers, with third-party sources estimating roughly $4–8 per user per month and custom pricing for larger enterprises; a free trial is available.
Gartner Peer Insights Overall ratings for the IT VRM Solutions market. Accurate as of January 2024
4.4, based on 160 reviews. Named a Representative Vendor in the 2022 Gartner Market Guide for IT VRM Solutions
5.0, based on 3 reviews.
4.5, based on 31 reviews.
Currently not rated.
4.7, based on 41 reviews.
G2 rating Accurate as of March 2025
More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.
