Grip Security vs Torri (Torii): 2026 Comparison

Grip Security vs Torri (Torii)
Category	UpGuard	Grip Security	Torri (Torii)
General summary	UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.	Grip Security is an identity-centric SaaS security platform that consolidates SSPM, SaaS security, and ITDR into a single control plane to manage SaaS and AI sprawl risk. By analyzing email flows, browser activity, and IdP/SSO data, it continuously inventories all apps, including unsanctioned shadow IT, to prioritize and remediate risks such as exposed credentials, risky OAuth scopes, missing MFA/SSO, and misconfigurations using built-in workflows or existing tools. Purpose-built specifically for the SaaS and identity layer, Grip does not provide external attack surface management, vendor risk management, or security ratings.	Torii is primarily a SaaS management and governance platform designed to curb software and AI sprawl. By continuously tracking applications, desktop software, and shadow AI, it maps assets to human and machine identities, enabling teams to optimize spend, manage renewals, and automate offboarding workflows. While it includes identity governance (IGA) and an AI dashboard for tracking tokens and keys, its core focus remains operational. Torii is built for cost control and access management rather than deep security, meaning it provides no true threat detection, SSPM, or attack surface management.
Key strengths	UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.	Grip excels at comprehensive SaaS and AI discovery, combining email, browser, and IdP/SSO signals to surface the full long tail of shadow applications. By mapping every app to access identities and credentials, it streamlines least-privilege enforcement, credential rotation, SSO/MFA extension, and user offboarding. Consolidating SSPM, SaaS security, and ITDR into a single platform reduces tool sprawl, enabling teams to discover, prioritize, and remediate risks through built-in workflows and core integrations with Okta, SailPoint, and ServiceNow.	Torii's strength is application discovery: it positions itself as a top app-discovery platform, continuously finding SaaS, AI, and even desktop applications, including shadow IT, through a broad set of methods and a deep integration catalog spanning HRMS, finance, contract management, and identity providers. It pairs this with strong cost optimization and license management capabilities, helping teams reclaim unused licenses (with ~25% cost savings) and stay ahead of renewals. Torii is also known for a powerful no-code workflow automation engine that orchestrates app-lifecycle tasks, particularly automated employee onboarding and offboarding/deprovisioning, across connected systems. Backing this is enterprise-grade maturity (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO-only access).
Key weaknesses	UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.	Reviewers note that the initial setup and configuration of Grip can be complex, with a learning curve before teams become fully proficient. Another reviewer notes that the reporting center is limited in its ability to build custom reports. And because Grip's value hinges on comprehensive discovery, full coverage depends on feeding it the right telemetry, email flows, IdP/SSO data, and its browser extension, so deployments that omit parts of that data will see reduced visibility.	A few product limitations stand out for buyers. Reviewers cite gaps in integration coverage: while Torii's catalog is broad, certain tools lack direct integrations, which can limit functionality. The workflow engine, though powerful, has editing limitations: the absence of branching/merging logic and of import/export for workflows, and complex scenarios such as detailed user provisioning or license reconciliation sometimes require manual adjustment. Reporting depth is another recurring request, with some wanting richer insights and a more complete view of usage and access changes across all apps.
Usability and learning curve	Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.	Grip is designed for fast time-to-value: discovery is largely agentless, drawing on email, IdP/SSO, and API connections to surface an organization's full SaaS and AI footprint within days of a proof of concept. Onboarding is typically guided, with Grip's security team helping prioritize the highest-value risks in the first weeks of deployment. That said, some reviewers describe the initial setup and configuration as complex and requiring a learning curve. Overall, the platform reaches useful visibility quickly, but teams should expect some ramp-up to operate it proficiently and tailor it to their environment.	Torii is generally regarded as intuitive and easy to use, with a clean interface and strong day-to-day usability scores. Initial onboarding centers on connecting integrations to build a complete app and identity inventory. The no-code automation builder is approachable for common tasks like onboarding and offboarding, though building more complex, branching workflows carries a steeper learning curve. Overall, the learning curve is moderate and well-supported, with the main effort being the upfront work of integrating the SaaS estate.
Cyber risk data accuracy	UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. Threat Monitoring scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.	For SaaS and identity risk, Grip's data quality is a core strength. Because it correlates multiple signals rather than relying on a single feed, it builds a comprehensive inventory of known and unknown (shadow) SaaS and AI apps, and emphasizes high accuracy with minimal false positives. It continuously monitors for risks such as exposed credentials, excessive permissions, and misconfigurations, assigning risk levels to prioritize action. This accuracy, however, is specific to the SaaS and identity domain and depends on the telemetry an organization connects; it is not a measure of external attack surface or overall security posture.	Torii excels at discovery by combining signals from direct integrations, a browser extension, SSO, finance systems, and email to uncover shadow IT and map it to human and machine identities and entitlements. While automated ingestion keeps these logs current, data depth drops significantly for applications lacking direct API connections. Furthermore, the data itself remains structurally tailored for IT operational management, tracking spend and ownership rather than security telemetry.
Vendor risk management features	UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. AI-powered security questionnaires read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.	Grip is not a dedicated third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) platform, and it lacks the core VRM workflows found in purpose-built tools. However, there is partial overlap: because Grip discovers and risk-scores every third-party SaaS and AI application in use, it provides teams with visibility into a slice of third-party risk at the application layer and can enrich that view by integrating external security ratings (for example, through its SecurityScorecard integration). For organizations needing full vendor due diligence and lifecycle management, a dedicated VRM solution would still be required.	Dedicated third-party/vendor risk management is not a core function of Torii, and it lacks TPRM lifecycle workflows such as security questionnaires, formal vendor security assessments and scoring, and continuous vendor posture monitoring. Its vendor-related capabilities are operational rather than security-focused: it manages SaaS vendor contracts, renewals, spend, and ownership, and can assign basic risk scores and owners to discovered apps to flag shadow IT. This helps teams keep an inventory of which vendors are in use and govern access to them, but organizations needing vendor security due diligence and risk assessments would require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.
Attack surface management features	UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.	Grip does not perform traditional external attack surface management; it does not scan, inventory, or monitor internet-facing assets such as domains, IPs, exposed services, or certificates. Its relevance to the attack surface lies in the SaaS and identity layers. By continuously discovering shadow SaaS and AI apps, risky OAuth grants, and other exposures, Grip helps teams find and shrink the identity-driven attack surface those apps create. Organizations looking for conventional, internet-facing ASM would need a dedicated tool.	Torii does not perform external attack surface management and is not a security-focused attack-surface tool. What it provides is visibility into the SaaS and identity attack surface from a management lens: a continuous inventory of every app (including shadow SaaS and AI), the human and machine identities that can access them, and their entitlements and ownership. This inventory helps teams understand and shrink unmanaged apps and access sprawl, but it stops short of security-oriented attack-surface analysis and offers no internet-facing ASM. Teams needing security attack-surface management would pair Torii with a dedicated tool.
Customer support	UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite responsive, hands-on support as a reason they continue with UpGuard.	Grip pairs customers with a Customer Success/Technical Customer Success Manager who helps prioritize risks, build governance habits, and turn findings into operational controls, reflected in its hands-on, guided onboarding. Day-to-day support is delivered through a customer support portal and a help center/documentation site, with support and maintenance governed by a defined SLA that Grip may fulfill directly or through certified third-party providers. Additional engagements, such as deployment, configuration, integration, and training, are available as professional services.	Customers are paired with a dedicated Customer Success Manager and supported by a customer-experience team that emphasizes onboarding, education, and ongoing partnership, backed by a dedicated onboarding portal and a regularly updated help center. Torii reports strong, quantified metrics: roughly 90% of requests are answered in under two hours, and about 80% are resolved on first contact. A regular webinar series and customer education round out the experience, and support is cited as one of Torii's best attributes.
Workflow automation	Risk Automations turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.	Workflow automation is central to how Grip operationalizes SaaS risk. After discovery and prioritization, teams can remediate using built-in automated workflows or by orchestrating actions within existing tools such as ServiceNow ITSM and identity providers. Common automated plays include enforcing policies on newly discovered shadow SaaS, extending SSO/MFA coverage, and revoking risky access or OAuth grants. Its browser extension and ITDR capabilities support near-real-time response to identity threats. Bear in mind that the reach of automated enforcement depends on the SaaS apps and downstream tools an organization has connected to.	Torii's no-code automation engine lets teams build custom workflows that orchestrate the full app lifecycle: automating user onboarding (provisioning access to the right apps), access requests and approvals, license reclamation and budget enforcement, renewal management, and especially employee offboarding, where it deprovisions access across connected apps the moment someone leaves. Actions execute across integrated systems, with audit evidence streamed to SIEM and APIs/IaC available to automate at scale. The limitation is the workflow editor itself as it lacks branching/merging logic and import/export, so the most complex provisioning or reconciliation scenarios can still require manual adjustment.
Artificial intelligence features	UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.	Rather than featuring a proprietary generative AI assistant, Grip focuses entirely on AI governance, ensuring how an organization uses AI across its SaaS estate. The platform discovers shadow AI apps, agents, and embedded capabilities, maps them to human and non-human identities (NHIs), and classifies risks based on authentication, data sensitivity, and OAuth scopes. Teams can then use these insights to recommend and automate remediation actions through Grip's built-in, no-code workflows.	Torii markets an always-on agentic AI that continuously monitors the SaaS estate, surfaces real-time alerts, and proposes fixes while keeping changes human-approved, positioning itself as a SaaS governance copilot. AI also supports its core discovery and prioritization, helping classify discovered apps and rank recommended actions based on a team's goals. Separately, its AI Dashboard governs the organization's AI usage, forecasts AI spend, and monitors API keys, tokens, and agents. These capabilities are useful and expanding, but Torii's AI is oriented toward SaaS governance, discovery, and automation rather than security detection or a deeply branded analyst copilot.
API and integrations	A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.	Tailored specifically for identity and SaaS security rather than a broad, general-purpose marketplace, Grip connects directly to core IdPs and IAM systems (Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, SailPoint) and major platforms like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Slack, and Zoom, while capturing the long tail of SaaS via email and browser signals. For orchestration and risk enrichment, it integrates with ServiceNow (ITSM and CMDB) and SecurityScorecard, utilizes a browser extension for near-real-time policy enforcement, and exposes an API for programmatic access.	Integrations are central to Torii as it offers a broad catalog of deep, direct integrations spanning identity providers (Okta, Google, Entra), HRMS, finance and expense systems, contract management, and core SaaS apps (Salesforce, Slack, Jira, Workato, and Vanta). Discovery also draws on a browser extension, SSO, and email signals, and Torii provides an open API and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) support, enabling teams to automate governance and move data at scale. For apps without a native connector, custom integrations and the API help fill gaps. The main caveat is that coverage is not exhaustive, and some tools still lack direct integrations, which can require custom work.
Purchasing & licensing transparency	UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use Trust Exchange, UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.	Grip uses a transparent, per-human-user pricing model billed annually, with final costs determined by employee count, feature choices, and contract length. For organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees, published pricing starts at $8 per user per month and covers AI and SaaS discovery, identity-driven security, threat detection, and governance, while larger organizations receive custom enterprise quotes. Although there is no advertised free plan or free trial, a one-off AI Governance Assessment is available on request, and a proof of concept can be arranged through a product demo.	Torii does not have public pricing. Plans are quote-based and tailored by company size; its site frames offerings around Scale-up and Enterprise segments, and prospective buyers obtain pricing through a personalized demo. There is no publicly advertised free plan or self-service free trial; evaluation runs through sales-led demos and proofs of concept. Third-party review data points to negotiated annual enterprise contracts, reinforcing that cost depends on a sales conversation rather than published rates.
Customers	UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read UpGuard’s customer stories to learn more.	Grip publicly lists a range of enterprise and mid-market customers and claims to protect more than 125 million SaaS users. Examples cited include Interpublic Group (IPG), NFP, Alera Group, Pacific Dental Services (PDS Health), and Findlay. The customer base skews toward insurance, professional services, advertising, healthcare, and finance, though it also includes large organizations, such as a Fortune 300 advertising firm with roughly 90,000 employees.	Torii publicly cites a roster of mid-market and enterprise customers. Examples include Instacart, Palo Alto Networks, Bumble, Carrier, and Pipedrive (others cited include Payoneer, SimilarWeb, and monday), and published case studies feature Rock Content (which saved over $1M), AppsFlyer (managing 300+ apps), and HiBob (cutting roughly 25% of SaaS spend). The customer base skews toward technology and internet companies, as well as mid-to-large enterprises managing sprawling SaaS estates.
G2 rating Accurate as of March 2025	More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.	4.4, based on 5 reviews.	4.5, based on 304 reviews.
Security ratings	944 / 950	815 / 950	870 / 950

General summary

UpGuard manages cyber risk everywhere it lives: your vendors, your internet-facing attack surface, and your workforce. You get one platform that connects all three risk areas instead of separate tools and spreadsheets stitched together. A risk in one surfaces in the others automatically. A breached vendor flags your own exposure. A leaked employee credential links straight to the account and the vendor involved. AI handles the repetitive work of triaging alerts, reviewing vendor evidence, and completing questionnaires. That means lean security teams can run programs that would otherwise need much bigger teams. UpGuard fits mid-market teams, deploys quickly, and slots in without replacing what you already have.

Grip Security is an identity-centric SaaS security platform that consolidates SSPM, SaaS security, and ITDR into a single control plane to manage SaaS and AI sprawl risk. By analyzing email flows, browser activity, and IdP/SSO data, it continuously inventories all apps, including unsanctioned shadow IT, to prioritize and remediate risks such as exposed credentials, risky OAuth scopes, missing MFA/SSO, and misconfigurations using built-in workflows or existing tools. Purpose-built specifically for the SaaS and identity layer, Grip does not provide external attack surface management, vendor risk management, or security ratings.

Torii is primarily a SaaS management and governance platform designed to curb software and AI sprawl. By continuously tracking applications, desktop software, and shadow AI, it maps assets to human and machine identities, enabling teams to optimize spend, manage renewals, and automate offboarding workflows. While it includes identity governance (IGA) and an AI dashboard for tracking tokens and keys, its core focus remains operational. Torii is built for cost control and access management rather than deep security, meaning it provides no true threat detection, SSPM, or attack surface management.

Key strengths

UpGuard unifies vendor, attack surface, and workforce risk in one console. Customers describe finally seeing the whole picture, rather than paying for three tools that each cover only part of it. UpGuard also surfaces exposures that ratings tools and scanners miss, without the multi-week delay of a typical scan cycle. Lean teams can run the entire program without expanding headcount or adding a managed service.

Grip excels at comprehensive SaaS and AI discovery, combining email, browser, and IdP/SSO signals to surface the full long tail of shadow applications. By mapping every app to access identities and credentials, it streamlines least-privilege enforcement, credential rotation, SSO/MFA extension, and user offboarding. Consolidating SSPM, SaaS security, and ITDR into a single platform reduces tool sprawl, enabling teams to discover, prioritize, and remediate risks through built-in workflows and core integrations with Okta, SailPoint, and ServiceNow.

Torii's strength is application discovery: it positions itself as a top app-discovery platform, continuously finding SaaS, AI, and even desktop applications, including shadow IT, through a broad set of methods and a deep integration catalog spanning HRMS, finance, contract management, and identity providers. It pairs this with strong cost optimization and license management capabilities, helping teams reclaim unused licenses (with ~25% cost savings) and stay ahead of renewals. Torii is also known for a powerful no-code workflow automation engine that orchestrates app-lifecycle tasks, particularly automated employee onboarding and offboarding/deprovisioning, across connected systems. Backing this is enterprise-grade maturity (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO-only access).

Key weaknesses

UpGuard focuses on managing live, connected risk, not heavy, standalone compliance software. Full governance features, including policy and controls management, arrive later this year. Teams that need a mature governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system of record today can run UpGuard alongside one for now. UpGuard also doesn’t translate risk into dollar figures. If financial risk quantification is a must-have, factor that into your evaluation.

Reviewers note that the initial setup and configuration of Grip can be complex, with a learning curve before teams become fully proficient. Another reviewer notes that the reporting center is limited in its ability to build custom reports. And because Grip's value hinges on comprehensive discovery, full coverage depends on feeding it the right telemetry, email flows, IdP/SSO data, and its browser extension, so deployments that omit parts of that data will see reduced visibility.

A few product limitations stand out for buyers. Reviewers cite gaps in integration coverage: while Torii's catalog is broad, certain tools lack direct integrations, which can limit functionality. The workflow engine, though powerful, has editing limitations: the absence of branching/merging logic and of import/export for workflows, and complex scenarios such as detailed user provisioning or license reconciliation sometimes require manual adjustment. Reporting depth is another recurring request, with some wanting richer insights and a more complete view of usage and access changes across all apps.

Usability and learning curve

Teams deploy quickly and get up and running without an extended onboarding period. New employees can learn the interface without lengthy training. A single console consolidates workflows that would otherwise require multiple tools, reducing the ongoing burden of learning and maintaining separate systems. Operating the platform doesn’t require a professional services engagement.

Grip is designed for fast time-to-value: discovery is largely agentless, drawing on email, IdP/SSO, and API connections to surface an organization's full SaaS and AI footprint within days of a proof of concept. Onboarding is typically guided, with Grip's security team helping prioritize the highest-value risks in the first weeks of deployment. That said, some reviewers describe the initial setup and configuration as complex and requiring a learning curve. Overall, the platform reaches useful visibility quickly, but teams should expect some ramp-up to operate it proficiently and tailor it to their environment.

Torii is generally regarded as intuitive and easy to use, with a clean interface and strong day-to-day usability scores. Initial onboarding centers on connecting integrations to build a complete app and identity inventory. The no-code automation builder is approachable for common tasks like onboarding and offboarding, though building more complex, branching workflows carries a steeper learning curve. Overall, the learning curve is moderate and well-supported, with the main effort being the upfront work of integrating the SaaS estate.

Cyber risk data accuracy

UpGuard’s data remains current. Vendor postures refresh continuously, and users can initiate a scan on demand instead of waiting for a fixed cycle. UpGuard attributes findings accurately, so teams do not spend weeks correcting assets assigned to the wrong company, a common issue with ratings tools. Threat Monitoring scans the open, deep, and dark web, along with social media, for leaked data, exposed credentials, and brand impersonation. AI filters out noise so the alerts that reach your team are worth acting on.

For SaaS and identity risk, Grip's data quality is a core strength. Because it correlates multiple signals rather than relying on a single feed, it builds a comprehensive inventory of known and unknown (shadow) SaaS and AI apps, and emphasizes high accuracy with minimal false positives. It continuously monitors for risks such as exposed credentials, excessive permissions, and misconfigurations, assigning risk levels to prioritize action. This accuracy, however, is specific to the SaaS and identity domain and depends on the telemetry an organization connects; it is not a measure of external attack surface or overall security posture.

Torii excels at discovery by combining signals from direct integrations, a browser extension, SSO, finance systems, and email to uncover shadow IT and map it to human and machine identities and entitlements. While automated ingestion keeps these logs current, data depth drops significantly for applications lacking direct API connections. Furthermore, the data itself remains structurally tailored for IT operational management, tracking spend and ownership rather than security telemetry.

Vendor risk management features

UpGuard runs the complete third-party risk management (TPRM) process in one platform: onboarding, assessing, remediating, monitoring, and reporting on vendors. Each vendor’s live external exposure and any linked leaked credentials appear directly within the vendor program, so teams can act on verified risk instead of relying on paperwork. AI-powered security questionnaires read vendor evidence and complete assessments automatically, cutting completion time by up to 95%. Instant risk assessments return a point-in-time report in under a minute, mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0.

Grip is not a dedicated third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) platform, and it lacks the core VRM workflows found in purpose-built tools. However, there is partial overlap: because Grip discovers and risk-scores every third-party SaaS and AI application in use, it provides teams with visibility into a slice of third-party risk at the application layer and can enrich that view by integrating external security ratings (for example, through its SecurityScorecard integration). For organizations needing full vendor due diligence and lifecycle management, a dedicated VRM solution would still be required.

Dedicated third-party/vendor risk management is not a core function of Torii, and it lacks TPRM lifecycle workflows such as security questionnaires, formal vendor security assessments and scoring, and continuous vendor posture monitoring. Its vendor-related capabilities are operational rather than security-focused: it manages SaaS vendor contracts, renewals, spend, and ownership, and can assign basic risk scores and owners to discovered apps to flag shadow IT. This helps teams keep an inventory of which vendors are in use and govern access to them, but organizations needing vendor security due diligence and risk assessments would require a dedicated VRM/TPRM tool.

Attack surface management features

UpGuard continuously monitors your internet-facing footprint. It maps assets, flags exposures such as misconfigurations, expired certificates, and open ports, and ranks remediation priorities. The UpGuard platform also detects typosquatting and lookalike domains set up to impersonate your brand before they’re used for phishing. Because attack surface monitoring runs alongside vendor and workforce risk, an exposed asset or leaked credential automatically links to the person and vendor involved. This gives teams visibility into both external exposure and vendor risk in a single view.

Grip does not perform traditional external attack surface management; it does not scan, inventory, or monitor internet-facing assets such as domains, IPs, exposed services, or certificates. Its relevance to the attack surface lies in the SaaS and identity layers. By continuously discovering shadow SaaS and AI apps, risky OAuth grants, and other exposures, Grip helps teams find and shrink the identity-driven attack surface those apps create. Organizations looking for conventional, internet-facing ASM would need a dedicated tool.

Torii does not perform external attack surface management and is not a security-focused attack-surface tool. What it provides is visibility into the SaaS and identity attack surface from a management lens: a continuous inventory of every app (including shadow SaaS and AI), the human and machine identities that can access them, and their entitlements and ownership. This inventory helps teams understand and shrink unmanaged apps and access sprawl, but it stops short of security-oriented attack-surface analysis and offers no internet-facing ASM. Teams needing security attack-surface management would pair Torii with a dedicated tool.

Customer support

UpGuard supports every customer across all plan tiers, from the smallest plan to the largest. Support teams assist with both technical setup and larger program decisions. Customers frequently cite responsive, hands-on support as a reason they continue with UpGuard.

Grip pairs customers with a Customer Success/Technical Customer Success Manager who helps prioritize risks, build governance habits, and turn findings into operational controls, reflected in its hands-on, guided onboarding. Day-to-day support is delivered through a customer support portal and a help center/documentation site, with support and maintenance governed by a defined SLA that Grip may fulfill directly or through certified third-party providers. Additional engagements, such as deployment, configuration, integration, and training, are available as professional services.

Customers are paired with a dedicated Customer Success Manager and supported by a customer-experience team that emphasizes onboarding, education, and ongoing partnership, backed by a dedicated onboarding portal and a regularly updated help center. Torii reports strong, quantified metrics: roughly 90% of requests are answered in under two hours, and about 80% are resolved on first contact. A regular webinar series and customer education round out the experience, and support is cited as one of Torii's best attributes.

Workflow automation

Risk Automations turns a risk signal into action across the platform, with no code and no engineering ticket. On the vendor side, it automates onboarding from questionnaire data, triages vendor score drops, schedules recurring vendor reports, and opens remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira. On the threat side, a Breach Risk detection can trigger a workflow that alerts Teams or Slack and runs a system-level fix, like blocking a malicious IP or forcing a credential reset. This is the difference between a tool that reports on risk and one that resolves it.

Workflow automation is central to how Grip operationalizes SaaS risk. After discovery and prioritization, teams can remediate using built-in automated workflows or by orchestrating actions within existing tools such as ServiceNow ITSM and identity providers. Common automated plays include enforcing policies on newly discovered shadow SaaS, extending SSO/MFA coverage, and revoking risky access or OAuth grants. Its browser extension and ITDR capabilities support near-real-time response to identity threats. Bear in mind that the reach of automated enforcement depends on the SaaS apps and downstream tools an organization has connected to.

Torii's no-code automation engine lets teams build custom workflows that orchestrate the full app lifecycle: automating user onboarding (provisioning access to the right apps), access requests and approvals, license reclamation and budget enforcement, renewal management, and especially employee offboarding, where it deprovisions access across connected apps the moment someone leaves. Actions execute across integrated systems, with audit evidence streamed to SIEM and APIs/IaC available to automate at scale. The limitation is the workflow editor itself as it lacks branching/merging logic and import/export, so the most complex provisioning or reconciliation scenarios can still require manual adjustment.

Artificial intelligence features

UpGuard’s AI performs specific, defined tasks, rather than vague “AI-powered” work. The AI Threat Analyst sorts and scores incoming threats across your attack surface, the dark web, and social media. It clears out approximately 60% of alerts as noise, so your team only reviews what matters. The same triage logic extends to vendor and workforce signals as well. Every AI result carries a citation back to the source, so your team can verify it before acting.

Rather than featuring a proprietary generative AI assistant, Grip focuses entirely on AI governance, ensuring how an organization uses AI across its SaaS estate. The platform discovers shadow AI apps, agents, and embedded capabilities, maps them to human and non-human identities (NHIs), and classifies risks based on authentication, data sensitivity, and OAuth scopes. Teams can then use these insights to recommend and automate remediation actions through Grip's built-in, no-code workflows.

Torii markets an always-on agentic AI that continuously monitors the SaaS estate, surfaces real-time alerts, and proposes fixes while keeping changes human-approved, positioning itself as a SaaS governance copilot. AI also supports its core discovery and prioritization, helping classify discovered apps and rank recommended actions based on a team's goals. Separately, its AI Dashboard governs the organization's AI usage, forecasts AI spend, and monitors API keys, tokens, and agents. These capabilities are useful and expanding, but Torii's AI is oriented toward SaaS governance, discovery, and automation rather than security detection or a deeply branded analyst copilot.

API and integrations

A well-documented REST API and webhooks let teams pull risk data into their own tools and trigger actions programmatically, without waiting on engineering support. For no-code work, Risk Automations adds more than 100 native integrations, including Jira, ServiceNow, Microsoft Entra, Slack, and Cloudflare. A Universal API Connector Node extends its reach to any open API.

Tailored specifically for identity and SaaS security rather than a broad, general-purpose marketplace, Grip connects directly to core IdPs and IAM systems (Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, SailPoint) and major platforms like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Slack, and Zoom, while capturing the long tail of SaaS via email and browser signals. For orchestration and risk enrichment, it integrates with ServiceNow (ITSM and CMDB) and SecurityScorecard, utilizes a browser extension for near-real-time policy enforcement, and exposes an API for programmatic access.

Integrations are central to Torii as it offers a broad catalog of deep, direct integrations spanning identity providers (Okta, Google, Entra), HRMS, finance and expense systems, contract management, and core SaaS apps (Salesforce, Slack, Jira, Workato, and Vanta). Discovery also draws on a browser extension, SSO, and email signals, and Torii provides an open API and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) support, enabling teams to automate governance and move data at scale. For apps without a native connector, custom integrations and the API help fill gaps. The main caveat is that coverage is not exhaustive, and some tools still lack direct integrations, which can require custom work.

Purchasing & licensing transparency

UpGuard publishes its pricing rather than hiding it behind a sales call. A free tier lets teams monitor up to five vendors and use Trust Exchange, UpGuard’s AI-powered questionnaire tool, at no cost. Paid Vendor Risk plans start at USD 1,750 per month, billed annually. Teams can start with one product and add others as they scale. One license covers both monitoring and assessments, so pricing doesn’t fragment across separate products.

Grip uses a transparent, per-human-user pricing model billed annually, with final costs determined by employee count, feature choices, and contract length. For organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees, published pricing starts at $8 per user per month and covers AI and SaaS discovery, identity-driven security, threat detection, and governance, while larger organizations receive custom enterprise quotes. Although there is no advertised free plan or free trial, a one-off AI Governance Assessment is available on request, and a proof of concept can be arranged through a product demo.

Torii does not have public pricing. Plans are quote-based and tailored by company size; its site frames offerings around Scale-up and Enterprise segments, and prospective buyers obtain pricing through a personalized demo. There is no publicly advertised free plan or self-service free trial; evaluation runs through sales-led demos and proofs of concept. Third-party review data points to negotiated annual enterprise contracts, reinforcing that cost depends on a sales conversation rather than published rates.

Customers

UpGuard customers include Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE), Morningstar, TDK, PagerDuty, Hopin, and IAG. Read UpGuard’s customer stories to learn more.

Grip publicly lists a range of enterprise and mid-market customers and claims to protect more than 125 million SaaS users. Examples cited include Interpublic Group (IPG), NFP, Alera Group, Pacific Dental Services (PDS Health), and Findlay. The customer base skews toward insurance, professional services, advertising, healthcare, and finance, though it also includes large organizations, such as a Fortune 300 advertising firm with roughly 90,000 employees.

Torii publicly cites a roster of mid-market and enterprise customers. Examples include Instacart, Palo Alto Networks, Bumble, Carrier, and Pipedrive (others cited include Payoneer, SimilarWeb, and monday), and published case studies feature Rock Content (which saved over $1M), AppsFlyer (managing 300+ apps), and HiBob (cutting roughly 25% of SaaS spend). The customer base skews toward technology and internet companies, as well as mid-to-large enterprises managing sprawling SaaS estates.

G2 rating Accurate as of March 2025

More than 700 verified reviews give UpGuard a 4.5 out of 5 rating on G2. UpGuard also holds G2’s top ranking as the leader in Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management for 15 consecutive quarters. The 2026 G2 Best Software Awards recognized UpGuard as one of the Top 100 Global Software Companies. Among verified reviewers, 98% give UpGuard four- or five-star ratings, and 94% approve of its product direction.

4.4, based on 5 reviews.

4.5, based on 304 reviews.

Security ratings

944 / 950

815 / 950

870 / 950

Grip Security vs Torri (Torii) product overview

Learn more about the products and how they compare.

We assess three user risk solutions — Grip Security, Torri (Torii), and UpGuard — to help you make an informed decision before investing in the right solution for your needs.

Grip Security Overview

Grip Security is an identity-centric SaaS security platform that consolidates SaaS security posture management (SSPM), SaaS security, and Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) into a single control plane to manage SaaS and AI sprawl risk. It analyzes email flows, browser activity, and IdP/SSO data to continuously inventory every app, including unsanctioned shadow IT, then prioritizes and remediates risks like exposed credentials, risky OAuth scopes, missing MFA/SSO, and misconfigurations. Purpose-built for the SaaS and identity layer, it doesn’t provide external attack surface management, vendor risk management, or security ratings.

Torii Overview

Torii is a SaaS management and governance platform that helps IT and finance teams take control of SaaS and AI sprawl. It continuously discovers every application in use, from shadow SaaS to AI tools and desktop apps, and maps each to the human and machine identities behind it. That inventory lets teams reclaim unused licenses (Torii cites ~25% cost savings), cut renewal waste, and revoke access at offboarding. Alongside core SaaS management, it adds identity governance and administration (IGA) and an AI dashboard for forecasting AI spend and monitoring keys, tokens, and agents.

UpGuard Overview

UpGuard is a third-party risk and attack surface management platform that helps global organizations prevent data breaches, monitor third-party vendors, and improve their security posture. UpGuard’s platform uses proprietary security ratings, data leak detection capabilities, and remediation workflows to proactively identify security exposures. UpGuard’s all-in-one third-party risk and attack surface management software intelligently groups risks into six categories: website risks, email security, network security, phishing & malware, reputation risk, and brand protection.

Usability and the learning curve

Grip Security: Discovery is largely agentless, drawing on email, IdP/SSO, and API connections to surface an organization’s full SaaS and AI footprint within days of a proof of concept. Onboarding is typically guided, with Grip’s security team helping prioritize the highest-value risks in the first weeks of deployment, though some reviewers describe initial setup and configuration as complex, with a learning curve before teams become fully proficient.

Torii: Generally regarded as intuitive, Torii offers clean dashboards and strong day-to-day usability scores. Onboarding centers on connecting integrations to build the app and identity inventory, with G2 data putting typical time-to-implement at around two months. Its no-code automation builder is approachable for common tasks like onboarding and offboarding, though building more complex, branching workflows carries a steeper learning curve.

UpGuard: High-level summation of risk with the ability to drill down into precise technical details. Each risk is prioritized based on extensive research conducted by the in-house security team, and where possible remediation and protection suggestions are provided.

Capabilities

Grip Security: Grip works from outside the app itself, correlating email flows, browser activity, and IdP/SSO signals into a single inventory that covers sanctioned and unsanctioned SaaS and AI apps alike. Its strength is breadth of discovery: mapping every app to the identities and credentials behind it streamlines least-privilege enforcement, credential rotation, and offboarding. Its most cited limitation is a reporting center that reviewers describe as limited for building custom reports, on top of a setup process some find complex.

Torii: Built for operational control, Torii discovers the full SaaS, AI, and desktop footprint and turns that into license optimization, renewal management, and no-code lifecycle automation for onboarding and offboarding. Its strength is breadth of discovery paired with automation; its limitation is that it provides no threat detection, SSPM, or attack-surface management, and some integrations require manual work where native connectors don’t exist.

UpGuard: Offers real-time visibility into any third-party vendor’s risk posture and security rating along with total automation for managing vendor due diligence and remediation programs.

Community support

Grip Security: A Customer Success or Technical Customer Success Manager works with customers directly, prioritizing risks and turning findings into operational controls as part of hands-on, guided onboarding. Day-to-day support runs through a customer support portal and a help center, governed by a defined SLA that Grip fulfills directly or through certified third-party providers; deployment, configuration, integration, and training are available as separate professional services.

Torii: Support is a repeated strength in reviews: Torii pairs customers with a dedicated Customer Success Manager and customer-experience team, with reported metrics of roughly 90% of requests answered in under two hours and about 80% resolved on first contact. Self-service runs through a help center, a dedicated onboarding portal, and a regular webinar series, though formal support tiers and SLAs aren’t publicly documented.

UpGuard: UpGuard Summit brings together a community of security leaders from leading companies, explores the future of security, and helps businesses stay secure. The UpGuard cybersecurity and risk management blog is updated four times a week and the breach research blog has uncovered and secured some of the largest data breaches. UpGuard’s free weekly Breach Newsletter informs 20,000+ subscribers of the latest global data breaches.

Release rate

Grip Security: Release news lives in blog posts tagged “Product Innovations,” including the ITDR 2.0 launch and new customizable workflow features. There’s no version-by-version changelog or fixed release schedule.

Torii: Torii maintains a public Product Updates feed that ships regular, feature-level updates. Recent additions include automated remediation in Access Reviews, new integrations, and workflow enhancements. Torii also recently added a separate developer changelog tracking API versions (for example, v1.1) and endpoint improvements. Updates are tied to feature launches rather than a fixed release schedule.

UpGuard: UpGuard has adopted DevOps principles internally to develop, test, and release software continuously, ensuring fast, consistent, and safe releases. UpGuard has a regular release rate every two weeks, with all features, changes, and improvements listed under UpGuard Release Notes.

Pricing and support

Grip Security: The SMB tier is priced at $8 per user per month for organizations under 1,000 employees, covering AI and SaaS discovery, identity-driven security, threat detection, and governance. Organizations over 1,000 employees get custom enterprise quotes, since enterprise pricing isn’t published. There’s no free plan or trial, though a proof of concept is available, deploying in roughly 10 minutes via API and surfacing an organization’s full SaaS/AI footprint within about five days. See Grip Security’s pricing.

Torii: Pricing isn’t published either; plans are quote-based and tailored by company size, framed around “Scale-up” and “Enterprise” segments, with cost obtained through a personalized demo. There’s no advertised free plan or self-service trial; evaluation runs sales-led, and G2 data points to negotiated annual contracts (roughly a 14% average discount and ~2-month implementation). See Torii’s pricing.

UpGuard: UpGuard has a fully transparent and publicly accessible pricing model which you can view here. If you have any questions, please email sales@upguard.com.

API and extensibility

Grip Security: An API exposes programmatic access to Grip’s data for teams that want to pull it into their own tools, while a browser extension supports near-real-time policy enforcement directly at the point of risk. Integrations with ServiceNow (ITSM and CMDB) and SecurityScorecard extend orchestration and risk enrichment beyond the core platform.

Torii: Torii runs an open developer platform (developers.toriihq.com) with public, OpenAPI-documented REST APIs, explicit versioning (v1.0/v1.1), and a developer community offering sample apps and guides for custom integrations and actions. Its no-code automation engine and infrastructure-as-code support let teams automate governance and provisioning at scale.

UpGuard: Offers a standard API to pull data from UpGuard’s platform into other enterprise applications.

Third-party integrations

Grip Security: Connects directly to core identity providers and IAM systems: Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, and SailPoint. It also connects to major platforms like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Slack, and Zoom, capturing the long tail of SaaS through email and browser signals.

Torii: Torii offers a broad catalog of deep, direct integrations across identity providers (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra), HRMS, finance and expense systems, contract management, and core SaaS apps (Salesforce, Slack, Jira, Workato, Vanta, ServiceNow), with custom integrations via its API for apps that lack a native connector.

UpGuard: Integrates with Zapier to enable connections to 3,000+ apps; GRC platforms, ticketing systems like JIRA; VRM solutions like ServiceNow, and more.

Customers

Grip Security: Interpublic Group (IPG), NFP, Alera Group, Pacific Dental Services (PDS Health), and Findlay.

Torii: Instacart, Palo Alto Networks, Bumble, Carrier, and Pipedrive.

UpGuard: Major customers include Accenture, DuPont, Fujitsu, GAP, McAfee.

Grip Security vs Torri (Torii)

Did you know UpGuard was voted #1 on G2 and has been for over two years?