Supply chains are complicated. A healthy supply chain relies on an uninterrupted chain of success across a series of processes. This is a fragile status to maintain since it only takes a minor disruption in a single process to cause financially damaging delays in the entire production line - a phenomenon that impacted most of the world at the height of the global pandemic.
To increase efficiency and resilience to disruption during the pandemic, business entities enthusiastically embraced digital transformation - a move that, ironically, exacerbated many of the problems it was hoping to solve. The problem with digital transformation is that it expands the attack surface - the more digital solutions you have, the more cyberattack options you give to cybercriminals.
The modern supply chain is, therefore, consistently at a heightened risk of a cyberattack, which has cascading effects across all categories of supply chain risk.
Given the considerable competitive advantage of digital solutions, unwinding the progression of digital transformation will only impede business continuity. Instead, the supply chain management ecosystem should introduce risk mitigation strategies to support its continual enhancement without impeding supply chain resilience - a methodology known as supply chain risk management.
Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) is the practice of identifying and addressing all risks and vulnerabilities throughout the supply chain.
The supply chain risk landscape should be divided into six categories to simplify risk identification and the design of a risk management strategy.
Cybersecurity risks disproportionately impact the global supply chain because their ripple effects spread across almost every supply chain risk category.
Track supply chain risks with this free pandemic questionnaire template >
Because cybersecurity risks have a dominant impact on supply chain integrity, risk management practices should primarily focus on this risk category.
A strategy for mitigating risks in the cybersecurity category needs to meet the following requirements:
Each of these metrics can be addressed with the following best practices.
Third-party providers introduce significant security risks into your ecosystem. It's estimated that compromised third parties cause almost 60% of data breach events. To suppress third-party risks, the complete lifecycle of a vendor relationship needs to be secured, from vetting prospective retailers to audits of long-standing relationships.
Third-party due diligence is achieved through a combination of risk assessments, security ratings, and security questionnaire automation software to achieve the most accurate representation of each third-party's security posture.
All three of these functions are conveniently addressed in UpGuard's cyber risk remediation software, helping organizations meet the visibility, stability, and scalability requirements of an effective supply chain risk mitigation strategy.
UpGuard also addresses the critical SCRM requirement of tracking each vendor's compliance efforts against popular cybersecurity regulations.
Security risks are an unavoidable by-product of digital transformation. The goal of supply chain risk management isn't to completely eradicate third-party risks but to focus remediation efforts on those that surpass your unique risk appetite. The resulting security controls create a balance between inherent and residual risks.
%25201.png)
A risk appetite defines the necessary thresholds for Vendor Tiering, a feature of the most effective supply chain risk management programs.
Learn how to calculate the risk appetite for your Third-Party Risk Management program.
Vendor Tireing is the practice of categorizing vendors based on their security risk severity. Tiering vendors allows you to focus security efforts on vendors with the most significant impact on your security posture. This will suppress the risk of third-party breaches and supply chain attacks.
This effort results in deeper visibility into your third-party attack landscape while creating a scalable foundation for a Third-Party Risk Management program.
Learn about Vendor Tiering best practices >
Humans will always be the most critical cybersecurity risk in an organization. Cybercriminals commonly begin attack campaigns by targeting low-level employees to gain entry into a private network.
If a cybercriminal can trick an employee into divulging network credentials, the arduous effort of contending with network security controls is completely avoided. This is why phishing is such a significant cyber threat.
To address the critical human factor, organizations should implement security awareness training compromised of two components:
To sustain SCRM efforts, the practice should become integrated into the workplace culture. This change of mentality can be naturally enforced at a security framework level with a zero-trust architecture. Zero-trust also has the benefit of offering a higher degree of privileged account protection to prevent the compromise of sensitive data following network penetration.
Beyond a framework level, SCRM culture is encouraged by involving all levels of an organization, including stakeholders. Upper management should be kept updated on all SCRM efforts with comprehensive reporting - a requirement that will only intensify as regulations continue to increase their emphasis on supply chain security.
Employees should also be kept in the loop. This will highlight how their efforts contribute to the company's overall supply chain risk mitigation direction.