Wireshark vs Netcat for Network Protocol Analysis

Network Protocol Analyzers (a.k.a. traffic packet analyzers or sniffers) are essential instruments in the network and/or security professional’s toolbox. The ability to examine traffic in motion across a network is critical for optimizing network topologies, troubleshooting malfunctioning or poorly-performing applications, and perhaps most importantly—identifying and mitigating cyber attacks. In this comparison, we’ll look at two leading network protocol analysis tools—Wireshark and Netcat—to see how they stack up against each other.

Protocol Analysis 101

Data packets form the essential building blocks of information technology. All internet communications and media/files—from video and music to email and chat sessions—are transmitted as these discrete units of data. Tools for capturing and decoding data packets are therefore fundamental instruments for proper network management. Without them, IT and operations are at a loss as to what is actually being transmitted across their networks. Network protocol analysis tools give IT specialists a microscopic view of data moving back and forth across network nodes.

Wireshark by Riverbed Technology

Wireshark is arguably the most widely-used network protocol analyzer on the market today. The free, open source tool was originally known as Ethereal, but has since been renamed due to trademark issues.

Wireshark by Riverbed Technology

Netcat by Hobbit

Commonly abbreviated and referred to as nc, Netcat is a hailed by many network professionals as the Swiss Army Knife for TCP/IP-based network analysis. Its popularity is primarily due to its lightweight extensibility and feature-rich network debugging and investigation capabilities.

Netcat by Hobbit

Side-By-Side Scoring: Wireshark vs. Netcat

1. Capability Set

Wireshark is capable of capturing and analyzing data from wifi, ethernet, VLANs, Bluetooth, and USB devices, among others. Additionally, Wireshark is able to inspect hundred of different protocols. At the most basic level, Netcat captures and analyzes data packets over TCP and UDP connections between two nodes over any port—specifics in regards device type must be configured manually by the operator. Netcat is extremely extensible, and is highly capable when integrated with other tools and utilities.

Out-of-the-box, Wireshark possesses a broad commercial capability set as the tool is productized by Riverbed Technology (which offers a whole suite of enterprise offerings). Netcat feels bareboned but is designed to be custom-tailored and tweaked by hand; subsequently, its capabilities are straightforward but nonetheless comprehensive. In terms of packet analysis, both tools are competent utilities for network debugging, port scanning, port listening, and more. 

Wireshark Netcat
4/5 4/5

2. Ease Of Use

Wireshark features a competent GUI and is available on a wide array of platforms: Windows, Linux, OS X, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, among others. Netcat is only available on *nix platforms and is primarily CLI-driven, offering no visual interface for the command-line impaired.

Wireshark Netcat
5/5 2/5

3. Community Support

Both tools are highly popular tools with longstanding market presence; subsequently, both have vast volumes of community support materials available online.

Wireshark Netcat
5/5 5/5

4. Security and Surface Attack Probability

Per the CVE database, Netcat has 8 documented vulnerabilities since its inception while Wireshark possesses a whopping 322. That said, Netcat is a popular Black Hat tool amongst hackers and its mere presence on a host makes it a somewhat of a liability.

Wireshark Netcat
2/5 3/5

5. Release Rate

Netcat is currently at version 1.10, with 8 years having passed since its last release. In contrast, Wireshark's latest 1.12.8 release was made available in October 2015, with a preview of 2.0.0rc1 also released at the same time.

Wireshark Netcat
5/5 2/5

6. Pricing And Support

Both tools are free and open-source. Again, Wireshark is backed by a commercial entity and offers official documentation and support materials from Riverbed Technologies. Netcat has no such official support materials but has a broad array of support materials created on its behalf by reputable organizations such as the SANS Institute.

Wireshark Netcat
4/5 3/5

7. API and Extensibility

Wireshark supports a broad range of languages and possesses a rich LUA-based API. Netcat has no API to speak of, though operators with the requisite skill set can build their own minimal REST web server to fulfill this need. 

Wireshark Netcat
5/5 3/5

8. 3rd Party Integrations

For those competent with the CLI, Netcat is highly integrable with 3rd party tools. Wireshark allows for a host of 3rd party integrations through native C libraries or Lua modules.

Wireshark Netcat
4/5 2/5

9. Bug Bounty Program

No bounties exist for either, as both are free tools. However, Wireshark hosts an expansive, community-contributed bug database.

Wireshark Netcat
1/5 0/5

10.  Companies That Use It

Both tools are ubiquitous and utilized extensively by enterprises, non-profits, and individuals alike. It's worth noting again that Wireshark is supported by Riverbed Technology, a global leader in application performance infrastructure solutions with over $1 billion in annual revenue. Notable customers include Intuit, Michelin, Tribune Media, Allianz, and T-Mobile, among others.

Wireshark Netcat
5/5 5/5

11.  Age Of Language Developed In/Used

Netcat is written in C; Wireshark is written in C/C++. Both are of course venerable, foundational programming languages. As mentioned previously, Wireshark can be extended through modules written in LUA, a lightweight cross-platform language implemented in ANSI C.

Wireshark Netcat
4/5 4/5

12.  Learning Curve

Wireshark features a competent GUI, while Netcat is CLI-based. The latter therefore requires a stronger technical skill set to manipulate and manage; that said, operators wishing to perform advanced protocol analysis are in most cases adept in using the command line—with many regarding visual-based interfaces as hindrances rather than beneficial.

Wireshark Netcat
4/5 2/5

Scoreboard and Summary

The following is the scoreboard for Wireshark vs. Netcat based on the criteria listed above:

  Wireshark Netcat
Capability set 4/5  4/5
Ease of use 5/5  2/5 
Community support 5/5  5/5 
Security and surface attack probability 2/5  3/5 
Release rate 5/5  2/5 
Pricing and support 4/5  3/5 
API and extensibility 5/5  3/5 
3rd party integrations 4/5  2/5 
Bug bounty program 1/5  0/5 
Companies that use it 5/5  5/5 
Age of language developed in/used 4/5  4/5 
Learning curve 4/5 2/5
Total 4.8/5 3.5/5

So for an easier to use, API-extensible GUI-based tool backed by a enterprise software company, go with Wireshark. Netcat is a no-frills, powerful CLI-based protocol analyzer for experts—it gets the job done quickly and efficiently. Both tools are free and open-source, so cost will never be an issue. And for continuous security monitoring and vulnerability assessment, UpGuard is the platform to beat. Try it today, the first 10 nodes are on us.










Reviewed by
No items found.

UpGuard logo in white
UpGuard free resources available for download
Learn more

Download our free ebooks and whitepapers

Insights on cybersecurity and vendor risk management.
UpGuard logo in white
eBooks, Reports & Whitepapers
UpGuard free resources available for download
UpGuard customer support teamUpGuard customer support teamUpGuard customer support team

See UpGuard In Action

Book a free, personalized onboarding call with one of our cybersecurity experts.
Deliver icon

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest curated cybersecurity news, breaches, events and updates in your inbox every week.
Free instant security score

How secure is your organization?

Request a free cybersecurity report to discover key risks on your website, email, network, and brand.
  • Check icon
    Instant insights you can act on immediately
  • Check icon
    Hundreds of risk factors including email security, SSL, DNS health, open ports and common vulnerabilities
Website Security scan resultsWebsite Security scan rating