Vendor risk monitoring software provides your organization with a continuous, data-driven view of third- and fourth-party security vulnerabilities, including open ports, leaked credentials, and misconfigured cloud storage buckets.
Detecting critical security changes as they occur empowers your team to act on verified threats early, preventing minor security drifts from escalating into major data breaches or compliance failures.
Learn how vendor risk monitoring fits into the broader Vendor Risk Management (VRM) process, discover the key features security teams need to choose effective Vendor Risk Management software, and compare the eight leading tools with guidance on which use cases they best support.
Vendor risk monitoring is the continuous process of detecting and responding to changes in the security and compliance posture of third- and fourth-party vendors.
It closes the visibility gap between your periodic, point-in-time assessments by delivering a real-time, evidence-based view of each supplier’s attack surface. This provides the evidence your team needs to keep their risk profile accurate.

Vendor risk monitoring software supports the five key stages of Vendor Risk Management:
Do a deep dive into our vendor risk management overview here.
There’s a wide range of vendor monitoring and management tools on the market. When selecting a platform for your organization, check for the following features:
Select a platform that sends automatic notifications when monitoring detects a material change, like:
This gives your team a critical time advantage, allowing them to investigate and contain a threat before it escalates into a damaging breach or a costly compliance failure.
A core function of any effective TPRM software is automatically rescanning each vendor’s internet-facing infrastructure on a rolling, near-real-time basis, flagging issues like:
By comparing fresh findings to the last validated assessment, your security team can spot configuration drift and launch a remediation workflow. No waiting weeks or months for the next scheduled review.
Automated risk scoring uses data from continuous monitoring to rank and quantify each vendor's security posture. A vendor risk monitoring solution should also continuously update vendor security scores using external scan results, data leak signals, domain hygiene checks, and other security signals.
Look for a platform with a scoring process that:
Read more here on how to conduct a comprehensive vendor risk assessment.
A category-level breakdown exposes hidden risks even when the headline score looks acceptable. This helps you decide which risks you can tolerate and which demand immediate attention.

An effective platform should integrate smoothly with your existing security ecosystem using its APIs and webhooks to push information into other apps like ticketing systems (Jira, ServiceNow), GRC platforms, or SIEMs. This allows you to embed Vendor Risk Management workflows more easily into your organization’s workflows, resolving visibility issues caused by departmental data silos.
With an effective vendor risk monitoring tool integration, you can:
The right vendor risk monitoring tool gives you a central, permission-controlled repository for every vendor, including records of their:
Centralizing your vendor risk data calms the chaos of searching through scattered emails and spreadsheets while preparing for an audit. Your team works from a single source of truth, ensuring complete visibility, streamlined collaboration, and nothing slipping through the cracks.
Automated vendor risk remediation is a key part of many TRPM solutions. When vendor monitoring detects an issue, like an open RDP port or an expired TLS certificate, the platform should:
Replacing ad hoc emails with this structured, auditable workflow helps teams respond to vendor cyber risks faster and prove due diligence during audits.
Your vendor’s security is only as strong as its suppliers. A troubling 84% of financial firms have been exposed to a breach as a result of a fourth-party risk—an incident where an external party is compromised because their own vendor is breached.
Look for a platform to discover and map the fourth-party network's dependencies. This visibility can help you spot hidden risks in the supply chain that wouldn't show up in a standard questionnaire or assessment.
Watch this video to learn how UpGuard detects obscure technologies in your digital footprint.
Effective reporting is a key aspect in presenting and justifying VRM programs to leaders, stakeholders, and regulators. Choose a vendor risk monitoring platform that generates timely and accurate:
This level of reporting helps you align your risk, security, and procurement teams while also giving senior stakeholders the confidence to support your Vendor Risk Management recommendations.
Choose a platform that tracks each vendor’s compliance with the specific standards your organization must meet, such as GDPR, ISO 27001, or PCI DSS.
Look for capabilities that identify issues like expired certificates and map them to relevant compliance failures, such as a violation of a critical PCI DSS control.
By aligning a vendor risk monitoring solution with your internal security frameworks, your team can assess and address third-party risks using the same regulatory lens you apply internally.
Below, find concise summaries of eight of the leading Vendor Risk Management programs:

UpGuard is ideal for larger companies seeking a scalable solution with a quick initial setup. Its shallow learning curve also makes it accessible for non-technical teams.
UpGuard connects with over 4,000 applications via Zapier and has native integrations with tools including Jira, ServiceNow, and Slack. It also offers a well-documented API for custom work for end-to-end workflow management.
See how UpGuard compares with SecurityScorecard >
SecurityScorecard is suitable for large enterprises requiring a high-level overview of third-party vendor risk exposure for executive-level reporting.
SecurityScorecard connects to various GRC and security platforms, such as RSA Archer and ServiceNow.
SecurityScorecard’s questionnaire module, Atlas, is a separate product that requires its own license. This separation can create disjointed workflows between a vendor's security rating and their questionnaire assessments.

See how UpGuard compares with Bitsight >
Bitsight is an option for complex businesses, especially in finance and insurance, where regulation and compliance require evidence-based risk insights and analytical forecasting of security performance.
Bitsight connects to GRC, TPRM, and SOAR tools like ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk, and Power BI. Its limited API supports custom reporting and specific automation tasks. Some workflows require add-ons or separate modules.
Key capabilities, such as advanced reporting and detailed risk forensics, are often licensed as separate add-on modules. This can increase the total cost of ownership and silo critical data from core workflows.

See how UpGuard compares with OneTrust >
OneTrust may be suitable for companies needing a Vendor Risk Management solution as part of the extensive customization of risk and compliance processes, integrated into a broader privacy, ethics, and compliance framework.
OneTrust includes pre-built integrations with platforms like RSA Archer and ServiceNow and an open API for linking to GRC, HR, and other internal tools.
OneTrust does not offer users external risk visibility, which significantly limits the platform’s risk monitoring capabilities. It also doesn’t detect fourth-party risks natively.

Learn how UpGuard compares with Black Kite >
Black Kite customers who want to implement a risk assessment workflow must consider integration options with separate third-party risk management platforms.
Black Kite is geared toward firms that work to understand the financial impact of third-party cyber risks and value risk quantification based on the Open FAIR™ standard.
Information on Black Kite’s external integrations is limited, but its AI document scanning requires integration with a separate TPRM solution to connect to assessment workflows.

See how UpGuard compares with RiskRecon >
RiskRecon does not offer an integrated risk assessment workflow. It also doesn’t support vendor risk monitoring during the onboarding and continuous monitoring phases of the VRM lifecycle
RiskRecon, a Mastercard company, aims its services at IT-centric businesses that need detailed asset discovery and vulnerability prioritization based on the value of assets.
RiskRecon’s technology partners include AWS, RSA Archer GRC, Nteros, and Smarsh.

See how UpGuard compares with Panorays >
Panorays is best for businesses that want simplified vendor onboarding and assessments with automated questionnaires. It also offers clear security ratings based on external scans and security details the vendor provides.
Panorays’ technology partners include RSA Archer and ServiceNow, and you can integrate others through its JSON-based REST API.
Panorays doesn’t release technical information on the sources it consults to determine security scores

See how UpGuard compares with Vanta >
You’ll need plug-ins to detect and monitor vendor security ratings, threat intelligence, and security postures. Vanta does not provide fourth-party detection or Vendor Risk Management natively.
Vanta is ideal for organizations focused on automating compliance.
Vanta has pre-built integrations with common cloud providers, HR Information Systems (HRIS), and project management tools. The API also allows for deeper data integration.

Researchers uncover a new cybersecurity threat every 17 minutes. Data privacy laws are increasing in number and reach every year in the US and worldwide.
UpGuard offers end-to-end security from onboarding and contract renewal right through to offboarding. Our platform provides a complete view of your vendor ecosystem through real-time monitoring, automated risk scoring, and clear reporting.